Talk:Interfaith greetings in Indonesia

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk20:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by Nyanardsan (talk). Self-nominated at 12:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • A couple of comments, not a formal DYK review. The main hook should say "include" instead of "includes" because "greetings" is plural. Also, the article leaves several phrases untranslated, including "Hadirin yang berbahagia", "Salam sejahtera bagi kita semua", "om swastiastu", and "Adil Ka' Talino, Bacuramin Ka' Saruga, Basengat Ka'jubata". The only translation provided for "salam kebajikan" is "Wei De Dong Tian (惟德動天) in Chinese". It would be desirable to include an English translation of each of the greetings mentioned. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   This article is about the practice of greetings used to open formal meetings in Indonesia, and these greetings come from Indonesian as well as other languages. For this article to be clear to English-speaking readers, all of the greetings mentioned in the article ought to be translated into English, and several of them have not been. (For DYK reference, ALT1 should be cited to https://www.dw.com/id/mui-jatim-sebut-salam-pembuka-semua-agama-bukan-wujud-toleransi/a-51196010 or another source; the criticism from the IUC is cited in the article but not at the URL above.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply