This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Innocent (Taylor Swift song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
OVERLINK says repeated links in references do not constitute overlink; I remember this issue has been mentioned and resolved on my previous GANs as well. Ippantekina (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cite MTV News as publisher instead on refs 9 and 16, only wikilinking on the first instance
Add url-access subscription to ref 15
Cite CBS News as publisher instead on ref 18
WP:OVERLINK of Billboard on refs 21 and 36
WP:OVERLINK of Slant Magazine on ref 26
Cite The Ringer as publisher instead on ref 27
Cite BBC Music as publisher instead on ref 31
Cite HitFix as publisher instead on ref 33
Cite NJ.com as publisher instead on ref 34
For online sources, see MOS:TITLE ("Do not abuse incorrect template parameters (e.g. by putting the work title in |publisher= or |via=) in an attempt to avoid italicizing digital sources.") Unless the online source is a database (like ProQuest), I italicize all online sources that contain original content. Ippantekina (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
listen.tidal.com → Tidal on ref 35, citing as publisher instead and piping to Tidal (service), also fix MOS:CAPS issues with the title
Actually the credits are the musicians of the whole album; I unfortunately don't have the credits for this specific song, so I removed it. Ippantekina (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice work on this one! --K. Peake 19:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, thanks for the review. Except where I responded above, I have addressed your comments. Let me know if the article needs more work. Please keep in mind that I unfortunately could not get back to Wiki after the weekend. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Just found this nomination. Currently working to help the article meet the criteria. May take a day or two. aaronneallucas (talk) 03:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC).Reply
Aplucas0703 Thanks for stepping in, what's missing is the live performance sentence being moved in the lead, the comma before third studio album in the first section being removed, mention of additional instruments and why has personnel been removed? --K. Peake 10:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Kyle Peake or @Ippantekina, do either of you have anything on additional instruments and personnel that I can use to improve the article? aaronneallucas (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ippantekina Restore the personnel section that was there before, mention the additional instruments in prose, move the live performance to where I suggested previously in the lead and remove the comma for third studio album in the body. --K. Peake 21:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
The credits from Tidal are for the whole album and not individual tracks, thus I removed them. For the remaining points, could Aplucas0703 take them over as I'm unavailable atm? Thanks very much, Ippantekina (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ippantekina That would be acceptable; as long as someone fixes the remaining issues, I am not fussed who it is! --K. Peake 08:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Apparently the other editor has gone inactive... so here I am, stepping in again. All should be addressed now. Thank you for your patience. Kyle Peake-- Ippantekina (talk) 03:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
✓Pass now, took a while and I did some copy editing, but we got here! --K. Peake 10:12, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply