Talk:Indian Union Muslim League

Proposed move to Indian Union Muslim League

• Comment. This has been listed on WP:RM since 15 September. Does anyone have an opinion? –Hajor 01:38, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Support. The name used by the party is IUML. MLKSC is only in times of elections. --Soman 07:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Discision

Page moved. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 01:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

PRESIDENTS PHOTO

PLEASE ADD AT UR SIGHT THE PHOTO OF NEW PRESIDENT OF IUML (SEYED HAIDARALI SIHAB THANAGAL'S PHOTO)

Vandalism by User Salih

To hide the hand of IUML in communal violence a guy named Salih is deleting references and text from the wikipedia. His act of unwarranted censorship be noted by wiki admins and suitable action taken. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Salih — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.193.161 (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Dear IP, it's true that few IUML local leaders are allegedly involved in the Marad incident. This can be mentioned in the article Marad massacre, if it's not already included. But, mentioning such things in the article about the political party is undue. I request you to be civil while discussing with fellow wikipedians. Thanks Salih (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean by allegedly?

The role of IUML's leaders in communal riots has been clearly proven by the Justice Thomas P Joseph. Read it or read the news articles linked below. Don't try to hide their crimes against humanity.

I believe you and striking out the word allegedly. But still it is not appropriate to include this section as per my previous comment. Salih (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Since the incident is related to the Political party in question and reflects their agenda and deeds it needs to be added to the page. 117.213.193.161 (talk) 08:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

And you have no right to censorship by unilaterally deleting references. You previously deleted marad massacre tag as can be seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Union_Muslim_League&diff=prev&oldid=503451104

I suggest you drop your communal attitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.193.161 (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Accusing me of communal attitude... what can I say, only laugh:) Salih (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

your guilty laugh is not needed, stick to the topic at hand. 117.213.193.161 (talk) 08:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Proof of IUML's involvement in communal riots

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-09-28/thiruvananthapuram/27830289_1_iuml-cbi-inquiry-ig-mahesh-kumar-singla

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/62-get-life-term-for-marad-killings/411268/ 62 get life term for Marad killings

http://www.hindu.com/2003/05/31/stories/2003053100621000.htm

http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Kerala_tables_Marad_massacre_report-nid-33289-cid-TNI.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.213.193.161 (talk) 05:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

adding more neutral references

Added reference from outside, adding mg radhakrishnan and India today reticle on position of different communities and parties, would like to remove the one source tag and original research as iuml reference is spread across different media, But feels that more reference can be added, like interviews of mr.Thangal or other office bearers. (Alex.mathews (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC))

No citations but a lot of information.

While the artcle is voluminous, citations are numbered. Not only does this render the authenticity of the article very poor, it has literally made Wikipedia a Propoganda mouthpiece. I request the admins and editors to revamp this article and make it more neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.172.135 (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Union Muslim League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721162429/http://www.indianunionmuslimleague.in/ to http://www.indianunionmuslimleague.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Extreme and clear bias in Ideology section

There is clear bias and the section looks like manifesto of Indian Union Muslim League. Ideology section shouldn't include laudatory quotes from online magazines Factpineapple (talk) 16:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)