This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
"Indian trade" not synonymous with "Fur trade"edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The content and internt here is not at all synonymous with that of the article on the Fur Trade. This article is weak and needs citations, but its intent is clearly to assay the relationship between European adventurers/settlers and the Native peoples of North America. While fur trading and its relationships indeed were an important aspect of the latter they amount to but one subset thereof.
Anyone wishing to edit and expand this article is welcome. Ditto to find a more representative name for it, integrate its content at a page where its subject is germanely examined, or propose a redirect there. It is inappropriate however make it disappear into a redirect to an article on a much narrower topic that does not deal with its thrust (of culturally induced confusion between the two sides of early trading relationships). Wikiuser100 (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm afraid your comments are extremely unclear to me. What is it exactly you would like to have undone? Who, exactly, is suggesting that this article is the same as fur trade? Who is assaying whom? What is a subset of what? In other words, just what in tarnation are you talking about? --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 06:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
It has been some time since your enquiry to be regarding the title of this section, and a good deal longer since it was posted. To borrow your adjective, tarnation if I can tell you at this point what it was supposed to have read. Best I can work out is that there is a typo and the title should have read "Undo a redirect to Fur trade page". Or something like that, as that is what I had done and was exorting against being undone. Hope this helps, Kevlar67. Cheers. 174.63.66.103 (talk) 20:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Since I am the author of the confusing section title I have taken the liberty of renaming it closer to the thrust of my original comments. I hope this is jake.174.63.66.103 (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
