Talk:Improvement district
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Number 57 in topic Requested move 1 February 2015
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Requested move 1 February 2015 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 12:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Improvement district → Improvement district (disambiguation) – The primary topic of this term is Business improvement district; with respect to the other two uses, the kind of municipality in Alberta is obscure and does not have its own article, and a tourism improvement district is merely one type of business improvement district, where tourism is the business being improved. bd2412 T 02:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose No evidence provided confirming the primary topic assertion. We have two topics about urban zoning applying to small areas within municipalities, while another is a type of municipality covering vastly larger areas. The primary topic is as ambiguous as the term. Hwy43 (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Are any of these not districts designated for some kind of improvement? WP:DABCONCEPT applies. However, that aside:
- "Business improvement district" has been viewed 8060 times in the last 90 days
"Tourism improvement district" has been viewed 474 times in the last 90 days
"Improvement districts of Alberta" has been viewed 481 times in the last 90 days. - In other words, "Business improvement district" has been viewed about eight times as much as all other meanings combined, including the meaning that is specifically a subtopic of it. bd2412 T 19:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- "Business improvement district" has been viewed 8060 times in the last 90 days
- Are any of these not districts designated for some kind of improvement? WP:DABCONCEPT applies. However, that aside:
- Oppose. It appears to be ambiguous to me. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. 117Avenue (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.