Talk:Imagine Software

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ijustwannabeawinner in topic Collapse of Imagine

Collapse of Imagine edit

The collapse of Imagine roughly coincides with the Video game crash of 1983 in the US. Was the British company affected in any way by events in America? Bastie 14:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Also: I'd love to see the BBC documentary mentioned. Does anyone know where to find it? Bastie 01:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I haven't read much of it, but this article from Crash seems to describe the documentary in question. --StuartBrady (Talk) 01:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have added an external link to the said BBC documentary. 82.42.133.198 01:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Brillant stuff. Thanks for that. Bastie 11:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't see the BBC documentary link. Has it been removed? 2fort5r (talk) 22:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Link restored. 2fort5r (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Here's the video on Youtube if anyone wants to see it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoDh61sgCOgIjustwannabeawinner (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Imagine Studios ? edit

Whats the difference between Imagine Software & Imagine Studios ? Not the same company ? --Joystick 03:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've edited the article to reflect what I think is going on with the name.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ezel (talkcontribs) 2007-08-04.

Fair use rationale for Image:Arcadia game cover.jpg edit

 

Image:Arcadia game cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links edit

I have removed three of the external links as they fail the WP:LINKSTOAVOID criteria, specifically "Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research" and "Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority (this exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies)"; none of the information in the sites linked to is verified, and none of the authors is notable.

I see from the history that these links have been deleted and reinstated before; I hope if they are reinstated again that the editor will explain how an unverified article on a blog written by a non-notable author does not fail WP:LINKSTOAVOID. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.93.164.23 (talk) 09:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Imagine Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply