| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Mistaken identity edit
Library of Congress mixes one or two other Andrew Gordons with this one.
- Andrew Gordon at Library of Congress, with 3 library catalog records
Select "Browse ... LC Online Catalog".
- Ilona Gordon at Library of Congress, with 0 library catalog records – shows no evident mistake but links no records
Update: Don't have an Acct, not sure how to proceed... edit
I noticed in the back of the ebook version of "Sweep in Peace" (after the epilogue) that on her book list it includes the Hidden Legacy Series novel "White Hot." This novel is not listed at my library yet so it would appear to be an upcoming novel? I've never done this before and I wasn't sure the etiquette of modifying other's work so I thought I'd drop a note? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.147.44 (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
= edit
Simon Lyon - snl@guisel.com I also don't have an account and don't know how to challenge what I feel are mischacterisations by Wiki at the head of the article. I apologise for using an edit of your article to do so. It states: "This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral." "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification." I would refute this in a two ways: 1. While the writing of various parts, including my own, may be contain a certain amount of subjectivity this is a creative work, not a scientific paper. The entry is about books that are freely available - there cannot be any dispute about the content of said books. There cannot be any controversy unless someone states a personal opinion. I have not found this or would have edited it. 2. As far "verification" of biographical details go - the writers are internationally famous best selling authors! How much verification do you need !?! Is it necessary to provide verification that, say, Stephen King exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.156.27 (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)