Talk:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Brada stone?

2017 Puebla Earthquake

edit

The damage to the church in the 2017 Puebla earthquake and any subsequent repairs should be discussed in the article.

Name change

edit

Jimroy had changed the title in the lead, giving a youtube video as proof. That video is no longer on youtube and I'm not sure if youtube is a reliable source anyways. If Jimroy or anyone else has a verifiable source for the new name, then bring it here for discussion and the article name can be changed along with the name in the lead section. HotshotCleaner (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article should be renamed. There is another Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios in Yaiza, Lanzarote, Canary Island, Spain. See Commons:Category:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios (Yaiza) -- 91.2.206.62 (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Right you are. I've appended " (Mexico)" to the previous name. --Stfg (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brada stone?

edit

This church is supposedly made of 'brada stone'. What is this? I can't find anything at all online. Lennart97 (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Lennart97: It was meant to be "labrada". I found this source, but it is practically the translated version of this article ("Reconociendo la importancia del montículo piramidal, el español optó por construir una iglesia sobre los restos de los terrenos del templo nativos" and "Recognizing the significance of the pyramid mound, the Spanish chose to construct a church upon the remains of the native temple grounds"; "La imagen de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios que protege la iglesia es de 27 cm de alto y está tallada y dorada" and "The image of Our Lady of the Remedies that protects the church is 27 cm high and is carved and gilded"; "Esta estructura arqueológica se compone de varias pirámides superpuestas, acumulados a lo largo de seis siglos" and "This archeological structure consists of several superimposed pyramids, accumulated over six centuries.") Every sentence here is there. Although this article is from 2009, and the other one is from 2015, that article cites several sources not mentioned here. Which makes me wonder, is this article plagiarized, or was this article plagiarized? (CC) Tbhotch 20:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Tbhotch: That's interesting, I can't tell which came first either... but thanks a lot for clearing up the stone mystery! Lennart97 (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply