Talk:Ian Morris (historian)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I have now added a number of facts and extra information asserting the notability of Professor Ian Morris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profile Books (talkcontribs) 16:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Update 30/04/2010 - I've now also added links to items mentioned in this article, added some categories and linked a mention of Professor Ian Morris on the wiki Monte Polizzo page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profile Books (talkcontribs) 14:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add wikilink for Geography as it is the key driving force in the book. edit

Add wikilink for Geography as it is the key driving force in the book. 99.109.124.74 (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's not a good reason for inclusion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Please define Good. 99.181.136.61 (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add redline Why the West Rules - For Now: The Patterns of History, and What they Reveal About the Future edit

Add redline Why the West Rules - For Now: The Patterns of History, and What they Reveal About the Future (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2010; Profile 2010; German, Dutch, Chinese, Korean, Russian, Taiwanese, and French translations, 2011) ISBN 978-0374290023 ... for potential future wikipedia article. 99.112.212.121 (talk) 19:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why? If it even deserves a section, it should be added here, first, and then split off into a separate article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'd suggest the anon should get a userid and write that article ... might be worthwhile and a good experience for the anon. Join the fun and create the article. Vsmith (talk) 02:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Interesting idea. How would you, User:Vsmith, suggest one start? 99.19.47.15 (talk) 04:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's clear that a section about the book, if it could be written, and sourced to reliable sources (not including the book itself), it could be added to this article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you really want to create a separate article, which shouldn't be merged into this one, as anon, you could use the protocols in WP:Articles for Creation. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add wikilink to Britain as the political and historical divisions on the UK are confusion to some in the USA. edit

Add wikilink to Britain as the political and historical divisions on the UK are confusion to some in the USA. 209.255.78.138 (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Britain is a disambiguation page. Which link did you have in mind? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good point! 209.255.78.138 (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add Great Man theory to define reference to "Great Men". edit

Add Great Man theory to define reference to "Great Men". 99.181.135.87 (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not here - perhaps in an article about the book - assuming the Great Man theory is discussed in the book, haven't read it. Vsmith (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rubbish "review" edit

More quotes from Morris which show why the Duchese reivew doesn't belong here:


And the footnote (2) says:


Etc. Have mörser, will travel (talk) 21:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

potential resource edit

Some of the 2011 Foreign Policy magazine List of Top Global Thinkers[1], named Why the West Rules - for Now in their top three Reading List, including Gareth Evans, Arvind Subramanian, and Joseph Nye. 99.181.139.218 (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

No credible reason for inclusion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/11/28/the_global_thinkers_20_most_recommended_books?page=0,1 The Global Thinkers' Book Club; Want to think like the world's best minds? Start by reading like them. The Foreign Policy Global Thinkers' 20 most recommended titles. November 28, 2011
Number 2; Why the West Rules -- for Now: The Patterns of History, and What They Reveal About the Future (2010), excerpt ...

"The patterns established in the past suggest that the shift of wealth and power from West to East is inexorable. The transformation of the old Eastern core into a Western periphery in the nineteenth century allowed the East to discover advantages in its backwardness, and the latest of these -- the incorporation of China's vast, poor workforce into the global capitalist economy -- is still playing out. Bungling, internal divisions, and external wars may hold China back, as they did so often between the 1840s and 1970s, but sooner or later -- probably by 2030, almost certainly by 2040 -- China's gross domestic product will overtake that of the United States. At some point in the twenty-first century China will use up the advantages of its backwardness, but when that happens the world's center of economic gravity will probably still remain in the East, expanding to include South and Southeast Asia. The shift in power and wealth from West to East in the twenty-first century is probably as inevitable as the shift from East to West that happened in the nineteenth."

99.19.42.30 (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Still no potential credible reason for inclusion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

clarify edit

Institute of Historical Research = http://www.history.ac.uk, http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews = "Reviews in History". Wikilink for clarity. 99.181.140.100 (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Foreign Affairs review edit

99.181.140.100 (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian Morris (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Ian Morris (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply