Talk:IKon/Archive 1

Archive 1

Comments

I believe CohenBot was in error, this is not a copyright violation. Asdklf; (talk),

@Asdklf;: Looking at the first article revision (which is the one that was tagged as a copyvio), the "Pre-debut" section does appear to be entirely copied from the provided link. It has since been removed however. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@SuperHamster: Ah, I see, thank you Asdklf; (talk) 01:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

The title of the page should not be iKon it should be iKON, change the name please. Soohekim (talk) 16:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

First of all it's iKON iKON iKON not iKon/IKon/other. Change please , it's iKON! Mambin1996 (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Junhoe, Yunhyeong, Jinhwan

WP: TOOSOON they do not have notability individually, only notable as members of Ikon Asdklf; (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

• Merge, yes I support the merge. Unlike B.I and Bobby, the other members have neither released a record of their own nor have been featured in another artist's record. They do not pass the criteria of individual notability yet. Same was done for the members of Red Velvet, only Wendy Son's article wasn't merged because she had released a single even before group's debut. FudgeFury^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 17:45, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Or we can create a list like List of Exo members or List of Got7 members FudgeFury^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 17:49, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay I just went ahead and merged them, as suggested by @FudgeFury:, into List of iKON members. This will probably be controversial because obviously a lot of work had gone into the creation of each of those pages, but each had very little to do with the actual person themselves and a lot of information on the process of creating iKON, through Team B and the voting, not to mention the indisputable lack of individual information we have about each member. Because of these factors I was bold. Asdklf; (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

• They would have been deleted/merged at AfD anyway. The source material is all still there so when they warrant individual articles, they're ready-made. @Asdklf;: dont forget to do Step #8 on WP:SMERGE to ensure the edit history is preserved. Crow^Caw 23:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed edit

I hope someone will add "Just Another Boy" and "Climax" to their discography. Those singles charted as well and, like "Wait for Me," were released under Team B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.252.233 (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

I hope someone will edit their stylized name as iKON for all the sentences here and add The Fact Music Awards as well. thank you Misskillua (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit iKon into iKON please . iKon is wrong. The right one is iKON How to change semi-protect or protect page? Korean Detective (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

No, "iKon" will not be changed to "iKON". Please read MOS:TMRULES. That capitalization is not acceptable on Wikipedia. ℯxplicit 05:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Who edit hanbin as past member Eryphrosyne (talk) 07:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Some guy names iamluke16?? Or something like that BUT HANBIN IS and WILL BE part of iKON this is just not right Tejrakwin (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

JUST PUT HANBIN BACK THIS IS SO WRONG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijustwanttoedithanbinback (talk • contribs) 07:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Put Hanbin back as a member!! Andearezalva (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Member table and excessive information

Please do not re-add a members table, nor add unencylopedic information like birthdays and ages for individual members. That doesn't belong on group pages. Take a look at any band outside of kpop - that information is not there. For individuals who are notable, such information belongs on their own biographical articles (if a reliable source is present). If you want to add more information about the members, take the list, put it in prose, and add verifiable, sourced, non-trivial biographical information about each person. That is the real goal of a biography, after all - Not tables and lists with trivia. Thank you. :) Shinyang-i (talk) 11:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Unreliable Sources

Besides from the large sections of this article in need of further sourcing there is a problem with some of the sources currently being used. I added the template to the page to draw notice to the issue. First off, Soompi and Allkpop are outright considered not credible. This is because both have pages on their sites saying they do not guarantee the information they report is factual. This makes them gossip blogs and not actual sources of news. The only exception for which a kpop article can source these sites is for reporting real life Award Show Wins such as the MAMAs. There is also the problem with repetitive use of YGlife. I'm not saying they are a bad source just that they are not impartial and it is always best to diversify sources when you can. Certain articles from them would be better if sourced from some where else. For example: "iKON’s Debut Concert “SHOWTIME” was a Huge Success and Captured Hearts of 13,000 Fans" finding another source for this article would strengthen it's credibility. Thank you for reading. Peachywink (talk) 22:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Do not copy and paste source templates

Please try to add sources only using the templates bar in the page edit window. Because when you copy and past sources, and then edit them to fit the new source, you are more likely to make careless mistakes that aren't immediately noticeable but can damage a pages credibility. There are lots of different problems with the sources on this page but for a clear example of a copy and paste error see source 39. It might look initially okay but the citation say's it was retrieved 3 days before the article was actually written. Please just be careful in the future with these things. Peachywink (talk) 20:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

the dimension video statement

The sentence along with it's two sources were just confirming that the video was a thing that happened and it exists. Neither said if dimension was important, if it was newsworthy or notable, and seeing as the video has under a million views on YouTube it probably isn't. If it's not notable and it doesn't contribute to the history of the group in some way then it shouldn't be mentioned in the article. Peachywink (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

What the heck is this page?

So while moving the reference section into column I noticed for the first time this: main article >> iKON activity

What is this page? It clearly doesn't go in the references but it also is just really unexplainable, I don't know where I would put a link to this page because it seems to span multiple catagories of information. I might submit it for deletion or merge. I'm not sure yet. Anyone else ever seen a page like this?Peachywink (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Can someone change iKon to iKON because that's how iKON should be written? Lylypudd (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

No. Please read the section below discussing why: #Requested move 14 April 2016. LadyofShalott 03:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes please, change iKon to iKON. iKon is wrong. The right one is iKON How to change semi-protect or protect page? Korean Detective (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

we need to add semi protection

this page needs semi protection because certain ip address is trying very hard to edit this page with false information . It would be better if we add protection . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neenamallireddy (talk • contribs) 17:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 14 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Everyone was in favour of some sort of move and the original proposal received the most support. Jenks24 (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

---

IKON (South Korean band) → IKon (South Korean band) – WP:BANDNAME says "Capitalization of band names should be consistent with the guidelines for trademarks." After reading MOS:TMRULES, I think this page should move to IKon, which will display as iKon with Template:lowercase title. iKON is a stylized version of "icon" and is pronounced like the word. Even though iKON is used most of the time, iKon is still sometimes used by reliable sources: [1], [2], [3]. It is common for K-pop groups to have very stylized names, but this isn't reflected in their Wikipedia article titles (e.g. Big Bang rather than BIGBANG). Random86 (talk) 02:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

• Move to Ikon (South Korean band) per band name 아이콘. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

  In ictu oculi, I don't understand what you mean. The band's official name is iKON. 아이콘 is just the Hangul transliteration. Random86 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• Comment. We should follow the RS. Chosun Ibo gives "iKON" while Korea Daily gives "iKon"[4] -- and "iKON."[5] Gulangyu (talk) 06:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
• Support – If Billboard and Korean new items think iKon is OK, as Goeorge's link show they do, then this would be the format that MOS:TM would suggest for wikipedia style. No need for more caps than that. Dicklyon (talk) 15:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
• Support per MOS:TM: The exception is trademarks that begin with a one-letter lowercase prefix pronounced as a separate letter. These are often not capitalized if the second letter is capitalized, but should otherwise follow normal capitalization rules. SSTflyer 07:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed Edit

I had changed the members section a few days ago (this is what I changed). I changed it because in other Korean boy groups it shows what positions the members have in their group and when the pages don't show it it's hard for people who want to know more about them since most of the that have info on them are in Korean. So I thought it would be a good idea to add their positions in the group. Then it was changed to this on account of the fact that "we don't do this for non-kpop bands". After seeing that edit I got a bit irritated and tried to undo the change but then the change was undone because there was a no reverting or undoing rule that I had not know about. I was told to propose my edit in the talk section so that's why I'm here.

I find it idiotic that my edit was changed based on the fact that "we don't do this for non-kpop bands" mostly because of the fact that iKON is a K-pop band. The user that changed my edit didn't even take away what I had put they took away what was originally there so I was confused as to what they were even on about. We don't put the birthdays and real names of members in non-Kpop bands or we don't put the positions for non-Kpop bands? I couldn't make sense of it. Korean pop groups often have members that don't have their own Wiki page and it's hard for people looking to find information in them if the don't have a Wiki page. I don't see a problem with them having their positions + birthdays + real names and stage names. It helps you know who is who. A lot of other K-pop groups have the members positions on their page and unless you are going to find and change every single on of them because "we don't do this for non-kpop bands" then don't change my edit.

Currently the IKon (South Korean band) page only shows the members' real names, their names in korean, and their stage names. I propose we change it back to the way I had edited it or at least the way it was before I edited it.

Also please excuse me since I was a bit irritated writing this

--Suesie69 (talk) 18:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

First of all you need reliable sources to back up your request, otherwise it's useless. I checked out the source you have added and it is obviously not a reliable source, I would have removed it as well. We can't use random blogs, fansites or anything like that. Also "a lot of other K-pop groups have the members positions" is not an argument because most of these articles are lacking reliable sources and are usually edited by fans with using sites like allkpop or soompi as sources. Overall K-pop articles lack reliable sources it's nothing new, it is a known problem. Positions are in my opinion ridiculous to begin with, the group has two rappers as far as I can see and the rest sings so they are vocalists it's simple. If you can find a reliable source you can add it of course, it's just my opinion because stuff like "he is the main vocalist, he has the most lines" is something that interests fans but it isn't relevant for a wikipedia article. If you wish to improve the article to meet wikipedia guidelines you have to learn to distinguish between what is important and what isn't.--Thebestwinter (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

If you didn't notice I proposed two changes. One was to change it back to the way I wanted it and the other was to change it back to how it was before I changed it. Which would be with just their stage names, real names, Korean names, and their birthdays. Also positions even if you see them as ridiculous are a thing that is very relevant to Korean pop bands and their fans so I actually disagree and think it should be in the wiki article. Just because american bands don't do it doesn't mean you should write it off if you think it is irrelevant. There is not just "two rappers" there is a leader, a main rapper, a lead rapper, a lead vocalist, a main vocalist, and so on. If you can't get it you don't need to just leave it alone. Again don't just write it off because you think it to be irrelevant. --Suesie69 (talk) 06:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Positions aren't relevant because they aren't encyclopedic. Most kpop groups aren't an instrumental band and don't have fixed positions like a sports team. While most groups are usually formed with a variety of talents, there is little consensus on who is main or lead and so forth. The fact that the fans cannot agree is good sign it's just trivial. You do need reliable sources for all inclusions, fan pages are not. Evaders99 (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

All opinions aside, my second suggestion is still being disregarded. I suggested to change it back to the way it was before I changed it. Also even with all this talk about positions being irrelevant and everything for some reason the positions are still shown on the page and the important things like their real names and birthdays are not. I came to this talk page so that the members situation could be figured out and everyone so far rejected having the positions there, okay I'm not mad it's just a difference in opinion which is fine because it was just a suggestion. Although it is irritating that I'm being told positions don't make sense and it's something for fans but that is the only thing on the members section along with the stage names- if I recall correctly. The only reason I suggested it in the first place is because it is hard to find info on iKON and it would just help people who want to get to know them without searching far and wide for something that isn't in Korean, but people disagree which is fine. Just fix the members section, no one had a problem showing their real names, stage names, birthdays, etc. right? So just change it back to that because what is shown now is a mess. --Suesie69 (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2017

Change the name "IKon" to "iKON". That's the correct format. 73.59.59.53 (talk) 07:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 15:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2017

Please change IKon to iKON 175.144.211.95 (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IKon (South Korean band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303130429/http://awards.melon.com/mma/weekly/index.htm to http://awards.melon.com/mma/weekly/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170211160114/http://www.excite.co.jp/News/asia_ent/20170211/Mdpr_k-enta1662738.html to http://www.excite.co.jp/News/asia_ent/20170211/Mdpr_k-enta1662738.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2018

Please change the name of the band properly to iKON. It's not just "stylized" as iKON but the name IS iKON. Other acceptable way of writing is ikon, NOT iKon or Ikon. For evidence, the member of the band itself, Kim Jinhwan, has expressed disappointment when an MC of a show they were in wrote their band name as iKon. A link to an article about it. [6]. Please help me change this. Thank you! Intrcvrt (talk) 04:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia has policies on trademarks - WP:MOSTM - please read and understand this. Evaders99 (talk) 07:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• LG전자, 프리미엄급 개성 갖춘 ‘X 시리즈’ 출시 (25673479820).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2018

change 'IKon' to 'iKON' Acexxbi131 (talk) 12:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. As per WP:MOSTM, the name is written correctly. Requiem II (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2018

Please do change IKon to iKON small letter i and capital letter KON, since this is the proper name of iKON (South Korean Band).

Please refer to this official website of YG Entertainment "http://www.ygfamily.com/artist/About.asp?LANGDIV=K&ATYPE=2&ARTIDX=67" Myoneandonli131 (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: See MOS:TM. ℯxplicit 07:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2018

"change IKon to iKON because it's brand name" Manelkonic (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 23:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

 Undone. Not sure how BrandonXLF missed the requested move above and the consistent denial of this change all over this talk page. ℯxplicit 00:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2018

Their name should be spelled as "iKON" not "iKon" there is no other way of spelling their name. Change it please. Gianne ong (talk) 09:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please see the related discussion at Talk:IKon (South Korean band)#Requested move 14 April 2016. A new discussion will need to be held if the name has changed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

SAME. I AGREE WITH THIS Heyhihellokct (talk) 07:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2019

Please change the current profile photo of 'iKON' to this. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IKON_Official_I%27m_OK.jpg) Since it was long time ago picture and that photo taken by specific brand for promotion. It can affect negative effect to iKON's future career 고구마좋아하니 (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. The image currently in use has been there for a year and a half (added here), so I'm hesitant to unilaterally change it -- DannyS712 (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2019

Hai, can you edit iKon to iKON. iKon is wrong. The right one is iKON (correct spelling) Korean Detective (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

No. ℯxplicit 05:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

(Korean Detective (talk) 08:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC))

Why?? it's iKON not iKon, the company made the letters, logo, etc iKON fans want to change the letters according to the real brand. iKON not iKon. We can't change the main page of iKon south Korean boyband since it's protected. We want iKON not iKon Thanks for read the massage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korean Detective (talk • contribs) 08:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

We dont use official all caps stylizations, only the acronyms are in all-caps like BTS or something. Snowflake91 (talk) 11:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

IKON DRUG DEALING CONTROVERSY 5.107.235.196 (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Already done. ℯxplicit 10:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

Please include the rapper B.I. in the current members list as it has nit yet been confirmed that he is leaving the group. He said that he was thinking about it and 'wanted to'. Thank you. Itsnpatel (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done. Confirmed departure from group and agency. ℯxplicit 10:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

move Past Member: B.I (rapper) to Members: B.I (rapper) K2v9 (talk) 07:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done. Confirmed departure from group and agency. ℯxplicit 10:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

i want to edit that Hanbin is stil in iKON Junhoeaddict (talk) 07:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done. He is not. ℯxplicit 10:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

B.I IS A MEMBER AND LEADER OF IKON DON'T CHANGE TO PAST

Member

• B.I

Chloechung22 (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done. He is no longer a member. Time to move on. ℯxplicit 10:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

X

ikon is not ikon without 7 members. there is no past member. please... ikonic want to see b.i name as member, not past member. 182.1.193.97 (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Asked and answered above. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2019

Please move B.I. from the 'past member' section to the '(current) members' section. He is not yet to be fully removed from the group so he's officially still a member and I think it's disrespectful to put him in the 'past member' section while this is still being contemplated. AnneM02 (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Asked and answered above. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2019

Grammar mistakes Jiminini (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 13:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Put Hanbin back as a member

Why put Hanbin(BI) as a past member? Can you just put him back!! You don't have the right Andearezalva (talk) 09:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

No. This has been answered multiple times above. He has left the group. He confirmed this himself. His contract with YG was terminated. He is not a member. Alexanderlee (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2019

Please add hanbin as a member of ikon we cant betray him like that besides he did nothing wrong and as we ikonics still think he is a member and he will forver be a member thank you 95.84.91.236 (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: As has been answered many times above, he is not a member. aboideau^talk 18:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 July 2019

Kim Hanbin is the leader of iKON. He is the lead rapper and leader. iKON is consists of 7 members. Namely, Kim Hanbin (BI), Bobby, Jinhwan, Yunhyeong, Junhoe, DK and Chanwoo. HSHfakyow (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Melmann 08:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2020

Since iKON's name is stylized as such (lower case "i", upper case "KON",) I suggest changing the following sentence of the opening paragraph of this page:

"iKon (Korean: 아이콘), stylized as iKON"

to

"Ikon (Korean: 아이콘, romanized: aikon; Japanese: アイコン, romanized: aikon; stylized as iKON)"

as well as changing the page title and all mentions of the groups name from "iKon"(incorrect styling) to "iKON" (correct styling). MarianaMNavarro (talk) 17:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done Styling of the group's name is already mentioned in the lead section, and that is all that is needed. Styling should not be used throughout like you're requesting. Please read MOS:TM. Alex (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2020

iKon -> iKON 42.190.41.140 (talk) 03:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done as said in reaponse to the request above this one, iKon is used per MOS:TMRULES. Alex (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2021

If possible, please replace all instances of "iKon" with the correct capitalisations: "iKON", and remove the unnecessary elaboration "...stylized as iKON". It has caused too many misconceptions; iKONICs are tired of correcting the spelling of non-fans who use Wikipedia as reference. VViKONIC (talk) 11:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@VViKONIC: this has already been asked and answered multiple times above and will not be changed. Alex (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2021

I would like to request to edit this page so that i can fix the spelling of iKON. For now it shows iKon when it's supposed to be iKON. Thank you. Dianahudani (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Same as all the answers above. Wikipedia does not use such stylizations. MOS:TMRULES Evaders99 (talk) 07:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Name of group is stylized incorrectly

Throughout this article, please change the lettering of this group's name to its proper form: iKON

Also, the group's fanbase is named iKONIC. (Don't know why Cite didn't work again, but this fact is verified on the same site as above, then by clicking the first icon under the phrase: More about iKON @ )

Note: Fanbases/fanclubs are an important part of the k-pop industry, so it should rightly be noted here as well.

Thank you for your kind attention to this correction.

Noschmidt (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Noschmidt: Their fandom name is irrelevant trivia, there's nothing notable about it. As for the styling, this has been brought up multiple times and the answer remains the same; it will not be changed. Wikipedia does not use styling throughout articles, it is mentioned in the lead section and that is it. See MOS:TMRULES for more information. literally all four threads on this current page are the same thing. Alex (talk) 10:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

References

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2021

Hello, i want to change iKon to iKON. The letter o and n are supposed to be a big capital letter. you can confirm it by searching it online. Thank you Mintf76 (talk) 02:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Not done: See above. ✗plicit 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2021 (2)

change iKon to iKON Xhaeyun (talk) 05:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Not done: See sections above. EN-Jungwon 05:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2021

Andexia (talk) 02:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)It's iKON not IKon,please change the group name.Check the official page. 

Not done: See sections above and also MOS:TMRULES. SkyWarrior 02:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

References