Talk:I'm Coming Out

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Amerie - I'm Coming Out promo single.jpg edit

 

Image:Amerie - I'm Coming Out promo single.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Diana Ross - I'm Coming Out single cover.jpg edit

 

Image:Diana Ross - I'm Coming Out single cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Diana Ross - I'm Coming Out 7-inch single cover.jpg edit

 

Image:Diana Ross - I'm Coming Out 7-inch single cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Meaning/LGBT edit

The article does not mention what the song is actually about, though it mentions Diana Ross changed record labels around the time the song was released. There is also no mention of the fact that it is one of the most popular and well-known gay anthems. I don't detect any homosexuality in the lyrics themselves, and seeing as Ross is straight, I doubt it is actually an LGBT-themed song, but, because the most common meaning of coming out is admitting one is non-heterosexual, the LGBT community use it to proudly express themselves. Can anyone explain what the (intended) original meaning of the song is? F W Nietzsche (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Truly, you jest? You need an explaination of what "I'm Coming Out" means? Jesus, it means coming into your own(self). Asserting yourself until you self-actualize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.188.55 (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image edit

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
There is no consensus in this discussion. AlbinoFerret 06:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright rules of Wikipedia, like WP:NFCC, would be enforced to discourage using more than one image. Therefore, we must keep just one of three: the US vinyl sleeve, (turns out to be Belgian) two: French cover art, and German cover art. Which one? If neither, how about US side label? --George Ho (talk) 00:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pinging SnapSnap and JGabbard. --George Ho (talk) 00:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • I am not convinced that the rules are actually saying that only one image is allowed. Many song articles have an alternative single cover and they are not bothered. Let's just leave it as it is. I do, however, feel that the French cover best captures the spirit of the song.-JGabbard (talk) 06:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I did ask one administrator, Masem. I was told that using more than one non-free image without critical commentary is excessive use. --George Ho (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
For album and single covers, we generally do allow one additional alternative cover image to be used, if that represents a significant release in the worldwide market (on the presumption that there is no further discussion of the cover art). So if there was a single that had a US cover and a significantly different cover for the EU, both would likely be included. In this case, coverages from two separate countries really don't match up - add to the fact they are simply images of Ross with labeling, and that begs the need to see the images, so both are not necessary under NFCC. --MASEM (t) 14:23, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • In that case, I pick the US one to represent the song, the US market, and the singer. George Ho (talk) 14:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC) (Read further)Reply
    • Either the French or German cover is acceptable. The U.S. cover is merely black and white text, and amateur art at that, and thus does not significantly enhance the article and its appearance.-JGabbard (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
      • As far as I can tell, the (really bad) "US" sleeve there was actually only used in Belgium for imported US copies; it seems to have been issued in a generic Motown sleeve in the USA. So I would happily drop that one altogether. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • We used the German cover art earlier, so let's go for the German one instead. George Ho (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Why can we have two images of Amerie but only one of Diana Ross? Even if this was permissible under the rules, it is undue weight to an obscure cover of a well known song. Anyway, all other things being equal, I prefer the French one as being superior aesthetically and being more in the spirit of the song and the artist. Gamaliel (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on I'm Coming Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Coming Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply