Talk:Hunter Lewis

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:Alternativecover.jpg, found on Hunter Lewis, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Company name

Cambridge Associates should be a separate entry linked from this profile. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.43.252.66 (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I added a link to Cambridge Associates. Adubs222 (talk) 03:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Rewrite

The first part of this article reads like a resume. The main body after the ToC seems like blatant adds for his books. — John Cardinal (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Do you have suggestions or just criticisms? The man is an author ... it seems logical that a list of his works would be included. Tschroeder250 (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The list of books includes the sort of promotional prose one would normally find on the back of the book itself, and in fact, I would not be surprised if it was copied from there (WP:COPYVIO?). The blurbs are all positive, including words like "excellent" and phrases like "sure to be influential", unsourced and unbalanced by any criticism. They should be removed and replaced by commentary from reliable sources. Some of the review links go to book store pages that are labeled as reviews but are just sales blurbs. All such links should be removed from the article.

This article has a lot of problems. You can reject the criticism if you want, or you can try to improve it. Overall, this page seems like a promotional vehicle for the author rather than an encyclopedic description of him and his work. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

External links within body of "Other Activities"

I added external links within the body of the Other Activities section for organizations that did not have a Wiki page (and used internal linking for those that did) in the 18:48, 19 January 2011 revision, but have since moved the external links to the External links section (as seen in the 20:32, 19 January 2011 revision) because I was not certain whether it was appropriate to have the external links in the body of the article. I looked over the External Links Wiki page for guidance but I still am not entirely sure whether it's okay to have any external links within the body of an article. Any advice on this from looking at the two revisions? Slowarithmetic (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hunter Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024045927/https://www.cambridgeassociates.com/about%20Us/ to http://www.cambridgeassociates.com/about%20us/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414193237/http://www.nacubo.org/x2321.xml to http://www.nacubo.org/x2321.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)