Talk:Hunger (Florence and the Machine song)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by StraussInTheHouse in topic Requested move 15 March 2019
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 15 March 2019 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved second. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
– The Florence and the Machine song is the clear primary topic for the song disambiguator, with 12 times the views of the Molly Hammar song and almost five times as many as the dab. Google search only finds one hit for the Molly Hammar song (its Wikipedia article), the rest refer to the Florence and the Machine song. Danski454 (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first @Danski454: the nomination is in breach of titling guidelines. Speedy support of second current title in breach of WP:PDAB. We don't have PRIMARYSONG, nor primary anything else. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I cannot find where it says moving this to Hunger (song) breaches titling guidelines, from what is see, there is just no consensus about whether WP:PRIMARYTOPIC applies to incomplete disambiguation. However, I would not be opposed to converting the incomplete disambiguation to a redirect to the dab. --Danski454 (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per WP:PARTIALDAB and In ictu oculi. PC78 (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per In ictu oculi and PC78. Hunger (song) should, indeed, redirect to Hunger (disambiguation)#Songs. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per WP:PARTIALDAB and In ictu oculi. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per above. Disambiguation is already not a primary topic. --Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per above, there has been little consensus to use PDABs. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose first and support second per WP:INCDAB. Partial disambiguation is generally a bad idea. —BarrelProof (talk) 12:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.