This article was nominated for deletion on 14 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Loxdale (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (Declares as the article's subject here)
Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Notability has not been established in this autobiography, there are 50 sources which are all primary, not a single independent reliable source let alone any in-depth. Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The more I cut, this less sure I am that there is a kernel of content ABOUT Loxdale rather than descriptions of research BY Loxdale. David notMD (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Spicy has suggested that the article should be cut down to a one-paragraph stub, I'm in agreement with this, the Scientific contributions does not need to be included in the article. Devokewater (talk) 08:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Article now 1/5 its maximum length. The Scientific contributions section still needs trimming, but I am against it being deleted in its entirety. David notMD (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
