Talk:Houston, We Have a Problem! (film)

As per [1].

If such a formality is really necessary then this is me raising the requested on the talk page. --79.175.86.192 (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

But what is your concern? What specific part of the article contradicts itself? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Parts "[...] is a [...]docufiction," and "[It] is based and inspired by [...]" with the "[...] however, it is a _real_ story [...]" part. It is either fiction or real story, you can't have it both. The "real" part is in the way, of logic, because it suggests the film is historiographic. Yet it seems it is an invention. --79.175.86.192 (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Crovata (talk · contribs) wrote that bit - prehaps best to ask them. Or fix it yourself. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

If the IP read the article he would understand what is the film about, it is intentionally "contradicting". That's the definiton of film genre docufiction which is a "cinematographic combination of documentary and fiction". The film is both historiographic and fictional, however, it's up to the audience to understand which part is real or fictional - and many fell for the filmmakers myth about the Yugoslav space program, however, the film is actually about the "real story of a manipulation, lies, dirty political games and media construction" which people take for granted. It is enough well explained in the article what the film is about.--Crovata (talk) 18:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)