Talk:Honorable Service Lapel Button

Ruptured Duck?

Why is the name of this article Ruptured Duck if it is a slang name for the Honorable Service Lapel Pin? Wouldn't it make more sense to call it Honorable Service Lapel Pin with a redirect from Ruptured duck (military decoration)? Jons63 02:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

With no comments against the move I moved the page to Honorable Service Lapel Pin Jons63 22:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Honorable Service Lapel Button. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071120121820/http://www.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123050401 to http://www.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123050401

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Qualification

The article states that the emblem is awarded to "[US] military service members who were discharged under honorable conditions during World War II". This implies to me that all members of the armed forces qualify, regardless of whether they served in active combat, were confined to desk jobs at home or served in intelligence (G-2) outside the war zones. However, I have a source from 1946 (Rex Stout, "Instead of Evidence" in Trouble in Triplicate, 1949, story originally pub. 1946) which clearly implies that only combat vets qualify—specifically, a G-2 vet who worked in the US did not qualify. Unfortunately, the source is fiction, so not reliable IMO in WP terms. Ref. 1 appears to be a dead link, & I couldn't find in a quick search anything relevant. Can anyone clarify? --D Anthony Patriarche, BSc (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)