Talk:Hongdu JL-8

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Thehistorianisaac in topic Retirement

Untitled

edit

This plane bears a strong superficial resemblance to the BAE Hawk - is it a license-built copy? (Mmartins 02:03, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC))

A copy, yes. Licence-built, no. Impi 17:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I should probably clarify. While the Hawk was evidently a baseline from which the Hongdu designers began, it's wrong to say that the JL-8 is a direct copy of the Hawk. More like it's what the Hawk would have been had it decided to remain cheap and simple instead of becoming the advanced Lead-In Fighter Trainer it is today. — Impi 10:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Why JL-8 is a copy of Hawk? Could you give any evidence? JL-8 is more like a revive of Shenyang JJ-1 which was cancelled in 1958, since Hongdu had a close tie to Shenyang in 1950s-1960s. German wiki has a picture of JJ-1 [1]. Sinolonghai 22:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The tail section of the JL-8 seems to be the same, or following a similar design to the JJ-1, but the canopy and nose bare an uncanny resemblance to the Hawk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.113.67 (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

First time I saw this aircraft and the first words out I of my mouth are - “this is a copy of a the Hawk”. The rear end (tail specifically) is different, but if you block that off with your hand and look from the point where the tail fin merges with the fuselage forward - its basically a Hawk. Of course it is what’s inside that also matter......but it is very clear that this is a copy from a physical design perspective. I guess if you cannot beat ‘em, join ‘em.

L-11

edit

Shouldn't this article mention the L-11 variant of the JL-8? The L-11 is the latest Chinese production variant of JL-8 that serves alongside the JL-8. The difference is the use of the WS-11 (a copy of the Motorsich AI-25TLK) which is more powerful than the TFE731-2A. Semi-Lobster (talk) 02:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tone and sources

edit

This article needs to be drastically rewritten, it reads like a company brochure and does not follow any sort of Wikipedia format for aircraft. Perhaps in the future I will rewrite it. Semi-Lobster (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Colors of distribution map

edit

Why are the colors of Chinese/Russian aircraft marked in red in the map? I see US-made aircraft articles marked in blue. Politics gets involved even when drawing a map? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.82.206.14 (talk) 07:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you look at all the maps at Category:Military Aircraft Operators Maps you will see red is used for some US aircraft. Not sure why the colours are political red is just normally associated with soviet forces, no reason why you couldnt change the colour if you wanted to. MilborneOne (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hongdu JL-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hongdu JL-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hongdu JL-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hongdu JL-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop changing the Main Article Picture

edit

Pakistan and China are the manufacturers and designers of this plane and i suggest they deserve to have the article picture of their JL-8/K-8 Xtreme o7 (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Irrelevant. We generally put the best photo of an aircraft in the lead/infobox that shows the aircraft in flight and at a good angle, and with a clear, bright background if possible. Who made it doesn't matter, unless we're trying to choose from several equally good photos. BilCat (talk) 17:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Alright i understand. I'm just kinda infuriated cus I've noticed possible hate fueled vandalism on Pakistan related articles and pictures. Take the Mi-17 picture i put on the Pakistan section of the operators of mi-17 article but when i checked it again after a day or two someone had removed it for some reason. Xtreme o7 (talk) 18:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Xtreme o7 I highly recommend that you read WP:RS (especially this section) before making another edit to this article. The sources you are using are self-published and therefore not considered reliable. - ZLEA T\C 21:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
will look into it. Xtreme o7 (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Retirement

edit

According to this video by the chinese military, the JL-8 is being retired Thehistorianisaac (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply