Talk:Holiday Bowl
 | Holiday Bowl broadcasters was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 08 June 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Holiday Bowl. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_logo.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
edit"However, after an investigation by the NCAA into illegal benefits given to Oklahoma players, that win was vacated" should be removed.
Why doesn't this article list which school's teams played in each year's Holiday Bowl??? That seems more relevant than MVP's or broadcast teams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.190.186 (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
February 22, 2008
When considering the vacation of the 2005 football records, the Infractions Appeals Committee determined that the university’s cooperation was a significant factor in the ultimate determination of the violations. The Infractions Appeals Committee stated that the Committee on Infractions report did not acknowledge or discuss the nature or extent of the institution’s cooperation, nor specify what weight, if any, was given to that cooperation. Therefore, the Infractions Appeals Committee found that vacation of the records was inappropriate and that penalty was overturned.
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/news_2008_0222_oklahoma_ncaa.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.217.207.33 (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
NAIA
editThe article should include a paragraph stating that the Holiday Bowl should not be confused with the Bowl game of the same name, played in the 1950s by college teams belonging to the NAIA. The wikipedia page for the NAIA has such a statement saying their bowl game should not be confused with the Holiday Bowl of the NCAA. Marc S. 206.192.35.125 (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
No reason to split
editThere is absolutely no reason why Holiday Bowl broadcasters should be split from Holiday Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 3kb long. The main article is 19kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 21kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Reywas92Talk 17:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
New Sponsor Logo
editThe Bridgepoint Education logo is outdated. It should be replaced with the new 2013 sponsor logo for National University. I have the .gif of the new National University logo in my possession ready to go. How should I proceed? Nuwebdev (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
The Pacific Life logo is outdated. It should be replaced with the new 2010 sponsor logo for Bridgepoint Education. I have the .jpg of the new BPI logo in my possession ready to go. How should I proceed?--Muzzy1027 (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Holiday Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091212164232/http://www.espnmediazone3.com/us/2009/12/bcs-national-championship-game-highlights-schedule-of-30-college-football-bowl-games-across-abc-espn-espn2-espn-radio-and-espn360-com/ to http://www.espnmediazone3.com/us/2009/12/bcs-national-championship-game-highlights-schedule-of-30-college-football-bowl-games-across-abc-espn-espn2-espn-radio-and-espn360-com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151225033606/http://www.goducks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=500&ATCLID=221423 to http://www.goducks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=500&ATCLID=221423
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Pac-12 Schools & Future with Holiday Bowl
editNot sure how "ambiguous" it is that the Pac-12 schools who are leaving this year are still eligible to appear in bowls with Pac-12 tie-ins when there's numerous sources stating as much, including conference commissioners! Big 12 Commissioner Yormark has confirmed this, as reported by veteran college football reporter Brett McMurphy. FBS College Football signs 6-year agreements with bowl games, and the current 6-year deal runs through the 2025 season, so exiting Pac-12 schools will still be tied to their former bowl games (minus the Rose Bowl, which is now totally absorbed by the playoffs). Tommac84 (talk) 09:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)