Talk:Hittite plague
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Cactusphage in topic Tuleremia Hypothesis not supported
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hittite plague article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | A fact from Hittite plague appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Hittite plague in the 14th century BC was the the first documented use of a disease as a biological weapon? Source: "...in what constitutes the first known record of biological warfare."
- ALT1: ... that in the 14th century BC the Hittites sent rams diseased with tularemia to infect their enemies? Source: "The historical documents hint that the Hittites... sent diseased rams to their enemies to weaken them with tularemia, a devastating bacterial infection"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Smyth (American football)
Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 21:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, interesting article. Within policy, but article could use a little copyediting (still some broken sentences) and precision when referring to things ("it sometimes appears in Bulgaria" is not really the same as "remains a problem in some countries including Bulgaria"). QPQ done. I think the linking in ALT1 is a bit WP:EGGy, but mentioning the rams looks like a nice idea.
@Bruxton, could you take a second look at the article and consider using the word "Hittite plague" in ALT1? —Kusma (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Kusma: Thank you for the review. I did some clean up on the prose - thanks for pointing that out. Regarding the hooks, I am presently trying to think of a new ALT. Personally, I feel like the catchiest hook would be ALT0 "first documented use of a biological weapon - it is hard to work rams in there. Reading the article would lead to the mode of transmission. But I am open to suggestions for hooks. Bruxton (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Tuleremia Hypothesis not supported edit
The tuleremia theory is only according to one paper in a terrible journal that has not been accepted. 2600:1002:B01D:55F:89F0:7BB9:E81F:36D (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Further to this several sources reject this theory. Notably Smith-Guzman et al. 2016 (doi: 10.1002/9781118962954.ch15). THe Tuleremia theory is first rejected by Martin-Serradilla and Guerrero-Peral. 2008 (doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.019) in a letter to the editor of Medical Hypothesis. Cactusphage (talk) 07:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)