Talk:Hindu Munnani

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kmhkmh in topic removed section

Height of Idiocy edit

In early 2008, Siva (alias Sivanandam), the General Secretary of Hindu Munnani at Kadayanallur, a neighbouring town of Tenkasi was arrested by Tamil Nadu police in connection with the bomb blast at the RSS office in Tenkasi in the Tirunelveli District of Tamil Nadu. After a thorough investigation, the Tamil Nadu Police had arrested 7 persons belonging to Sangh Parivar outfits. They had confessed that they indulged in this terror act to instigate the local Hindu population against the Muslims. Hindu bombs own office to incite anti-Muslim riots

I have never seen anything dumber than this. Anwar (talk) 19:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dumb? I'd say terrorist, but discuss the "dumb" perspective. Looking at any stats, it can clearly be seen who is the indisputably dumbest community in the world. Trips (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Twocircles does not meet WP:RS. In all likelihood, its some blog written by an mubaligh somewhere in Saudi Arabia for kicks.Pectoretalk 21:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I insist that User:Anwar saadat apologize for this edit summary:[1] -RavichandarMy coffee shop 18:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hindu Munnani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hindu Munnani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

removed section edit

I removed the follwing new section as to the vary least it violates Wikipedia format rules and ignores the already existing articles structure. In particular no bold/fat print outside in the article's main body and questionable activities by the party would need to go the controversies section. The also should be somwhat summarised (maybe shortened based on notability) rather than being an extebsive list.--Kmhkmh (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply