Talk:Heteroflexibility
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heteroflexibility article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Heteroflexibility. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Heteroflexibility at the Reference desk. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Axelman03. Peer reviewers: Nelischalich, TriMinhHuynh.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Foundations II Group 5b Goals edit
Improve article by adding well done studies using secondary sources
Team 5B cites a study with a specific example of what heteroflexibility is. The team explains heteroflexible men as being attracted to male genitalia but not identifying as bisexual. Overall the team does an excellent job; if anything I think another study would be beneficial for the reader’s understanding since the article itself is relatively short.
Team 5b presents a neutral perspective by citing a study and explaining the history of gender fluidity over time without any bias. DanielPerez144 (talk) 16:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
UCSF Peer Review of Team 5b by Team 5a edit
Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?
- Yes, this team added in a lot of new information from a good quality source.
Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?
- Goal: Improve article by adding well done studies using secondary sources. Team 5B cites a study with a specific example of what heteroflexibility is. The team explains heteroflexible men as being attracted to male genitalia but not identifying as bisexual. Overall the team does an excellent job; if anything I think another study would be beneficial for the reader’s understanding since the article itself is relatively short.
Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…
- The group provided information and statistics on the prevalence of heteroflexibility among women and men with a neutral point of view. They also neutrally cited a study that focused on the behaviors and thoughts of heteroflexible individuals. Christinewmin (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? If not, specify…
- Team 5b added 1 new reference to this article. I was unable to freely access this article so I cannot verify whether the reference supports the statements added. Mlomanto (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? If not, specify…
- After reviewing the guidelines, I see the group cited articles properly. Great job! DanielPerez144 (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation? If yes, specify…
Improving page title edit
Multiple phrases express a similar concept to the title of this page, as the introductory paragraph mentions. The phrase "mostly heterosexual" has become predominant in the academic literature, and as such changing the title from "Heteroflexible" to "Mainly Heterosexual" would be desirable.