Talk:Hesperocyparis guadalupensis

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cupressus guadalupensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cupressus macnabiana which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 20:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by MtBotany (talk). Self-nominated at 04:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hesperocyparis guadalupensis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Article expansion new enough and long enough. The article is well cited, with no issues or reliability concerns identified in the sourcing used. Both the Alt0 and Alt1 hooks are verified and correct. Alt0 could be reworded to be more compact?--Kevmin § 01:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    • I think making ALT0 more compact is a good idea. Brevity is where I fall down on a lot of my writing the first time through. Variation on the wording you suggested in the summary Alt2 "...that saving the Guadalupe cypress included the help of 40 Judas goats?"
      •   The condensed version you've provided looks great, nice and succinct. --Kevmin § 01:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Wanderer, Emily Mannix (March 2015). "Biologies of Betrayal: Judas Goats and Sacrificial Mice on the Margins of Mexico". BioSocieties. 10 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2014.13. ISSN 1745-8552.
  2. ^ De La Luz, José Luis León; Rebman, Jon P.; Oberbauer, Thomas (2003). "On the urgency of conservation on Guadalupe Island, Mexico: is it a lost paradise?". Biodiversity and Conservation. 12 (5): 1073–1082. doi:10.1023/A:1022854211166. S2CID 10038493.
  3. ^ Watson, Sereno (1878). "Contributions to American Botany: Revision of the North American Liliaceæ; Descriptions of Some New Species of North American Plants". Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 14: 213, 300. doi:10.2307/25138538. JSTOR 25138538. Retrieved 17 February 2024.