This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The article "Herminia Naglerowa" does have needed references in the form of Title/Date mentions in the text. However, expanded, bibliographic style citations are really needed, to assist people who want to learn more about these works, including at least the publisher, place published, and number of pages. Although Wikipedia has many recommendations regarding the best format to use, that is really not too important. Tim Ross(talk) 10:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
This may have to do with the fact that the article was started ten minutes ago.radek (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Were you aware, Radeksz, that when you publish a Wikipedia article, it is immediately listed on Special:NewPages, where reviewers check to see that it meets some of the basic requirements for articles? Such articles are also, at that time, available for anyone in the world to read, with the assumption that they are, indeed, finished publications. For those reasons, it is a really good idea to write drafts in your own "Sandbox", then, when they are finished to your satisfaction, go ahead and publish them. That way will save both your time and that of the reviewers. Thanks. Tim Ross(talk) 12:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
