Talk:Henry W. Sawyer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review
Featured articleHenry W. Sawyer is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2017Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Henry W. Sawyer argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark Establishment Clause cases of Abington School District v. Schempp and Lemon v. Kurtzman?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry W. Sawyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


Ok, I'll take a look. I am unfamiliar with the person so bear with me....jotting queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • I'd link civil liberties
    • Done.
  • Any other influences/inspirations that can be added to Early life section?
  • Shortly after joining the firm, he was assigned... - a bit repetitive as you've said "joined the law firm" in the sentence before. Maybe some dates here would be better than "Shortly after..", which is a little ambiguous.
  • Working under lead prosecutor Laurence Howard Eldredge and alongside assistant prosecutor Lemuel Braddock Schofield, Sawyer worked to convict Chief Magistrate John J. O'Malley of 206 counts of malfeasance in office, but he was found not guilty in two trials in 1948 and 1949 - a long sentence, which might be better split. also, you switch subjects in it, so the "he" (obviously O'Malley but grammatically Sawyer) doesn't quite fit right....
  • As a lawyer, Sawyer focused on civil litigation in corporate law, at which he was successful - was he 100% successful? Maybe another descriptor.."excelled/was very good at etc."
    • Done.
  • Another similar case was Deutch v. United States - a bit of a weak connecting sentence, could be made more exact I think...
    • Yes, done.
  • If you could expand the first para of Local politics - why they felt the way they did etc. Might be good.
  • Similarly the Civil rights advocacy section - adding colour/depth to the section would be good, if possible.
  • Earwig's copyvio is clear.

Sorry, I got sidetracked - all seems ok. 1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  


Overall:

Pass or Fail:   - a nice read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.