This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Because we are all fighting over this, his name is still Henrik Pontén, not Pirate Pontén. Though it may be legally, it was not done by his own freewill, meaning that the name change is only but a minor thing and will eventually be undone and likely changed to an illegal name change (which it really is) this means that at no time are we to change the article to Pirate Pontén. A prankster is a prankster, not Henrik Pontén and this will only last about a month or so. Rgoodermote 00:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Rules are rules, this name change was not of his freewill and was done to insult him. As a result, Wikipedia will not refer to him as anything other than Henrik Potén. For it is inaccurate and libelous and violates WP:BIO. I will continue to come back here as long as I see my watchlist report a change on the page, this is a fairly high profile individual. His article is also not as well known, some one has to defend it..and I am doing that against my personal opinion of the man. Rgoodermote 21:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
