Talk:Hello, Sister! (1933 film)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lugnuts in topic "no directorial credit is given"
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Hello, Sister! (1933 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 10:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the title of the 1933 pre-Code film Hello, Sister! is a pick-up line? Source: "In reviewing the film, MPH noted that the title was "the salutation of the 'pick-up.'" (AFI Catalog of Feature Films)
- ALT1:... that while directing Walking Down Broadway, Erich von Stroheim tied a 12 ft (3.7 m) length of thread to James Dunn's pants leg and tugged on it whenever he wanted the actor to emote more? Source: "He also details von Stroheim’s demand for a twelve foot piece of thread to tie up James Dunn’s pants leg. The uncompromising director gave his Dunn Jr. a tug whenever he required more hysterics than the actor was emoting." (Not Coming to a Theater Near You)
5x expanded by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 20:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Plot section of the article does not include any citations, but OK as WP:FILMPLOT says "Since films are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source." Earwig's Copyvio Detector turned up a 66.5% match, but this consists of either direct, attributed quotes or other non-problematic matches like titles. No issues with the other matches found either. Article has been nominated in time following expansion, appears balanced, and has appropriate citations. QPQ has been completed. Both hooks are interesting and I think both are fine - my personal preference is ALT1, as that's the one that made me click through to the article. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)"no directorial credit is given"
editIt's right there on the movie poster.2A02:AA1:1623:D674:907D:49E5:CF7A:D686 (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- See the cite in the lead (ref#2). Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)