| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heart (EP) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit♥ (Heart) (Savant album) → ? – This should be moved to either ♥ (Heart) or ♥ (album)/♥ (Savant album) (all of these currently redirect here), depending on what the exact name of the album is (it's either ♥ or ♥ (Heart)), which I'm not certain of. Either way, the present title is way too long for no good reason. Please help me decide on the new name so that it can be moved. --MASHAUNIX 19:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. It should be moved to Heart (Savant album) per MOS:TM. Zarcadia (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Question - Does this even meet WP:NALBUMS?--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - It should be moved to Heart (Savant album) per MOS:TM as User:Zarcadia In ictu oculi (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Move to Heart (Savant album) obviously. --George Ho (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Removing move template, as this has already been moved by the nominator to the title suggested by the respondents. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was any hurry when I moved it so I didn't have time to come here afterwards.--MASHAUNIX 21:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Removing move template, as this has already been moved by the nominator to the title suggested by the respondents. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Date format
edit@Emeraude: I'm confused about what you're saying on keeping the date format consistent, as only one source in this article that uses a date. How could this possible be more consistent than the previous rendering? I personally prefer the year-month-day format, which was why I contest a change away from that format if it seems without reason. ~Mable (chat) 11:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
@Maplestrip: The full day-month-year format appears in the second sentence ("It was released on 13 March 2013.") I was being consistent with the first use of a date. Emeraude (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC
- Oh, in the article prose? Well, uhm, ok then, I guess... Seeing as there probably won't be any other sources for this article anyway, I suppose it doesn't matter much. ~Mable (chat) 12:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)