Talk:Health 2.0

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Might edit

Might Potts HWW (2006). "Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers?" Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(3), e24[1] be of value to this article? Bondegezou (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Addition: CareFlash.com edit

CareFlash.com is in my opinion one of the best medical social networking sites... it provides a free service for caregivers to create an online comunity around a loved-one that is sick. I think it'd be an improvement to this article to add it to the Community Driven Social Network area. What do you think? Thanks, Klostermankl (talk) 03:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think CareFlash.com is very interested. What's needed is reliable sources discussing CareFlash.com or, indeed, any of the other services currently listed. Bondegezou (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If CareFlash had it's own wiki page, would that be notable enough? I know that ther are articls out there from businesswire.com, the Houston Chronicle and another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klostermankl (talkcontribs) 00:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If there are such articles, then they would probably be reason enough to mention it here. I'm not certain what the notability criteria are for articles about websites: try WP:WEB. Bondegezou (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you'd like to take a look at the article you can at User:Klostermankl/CareFlash at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Klostermankl/CareFlash. It's in my sand box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klostermankl (talkcontribs) 22:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

New reference(s) edit

I think we definitely need to include this new paper by Hughes et al. on Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0. Bondegezou (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've added some material citing Hughes et al., but as a major review article, there's more of value there. Bondegezou (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another article of possible use: [2] Bondegezou (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Health 2.0. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply