Talk:Hazed (The Hardy Boys)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move 22 December 2015

Requested move 22 December 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move the novel to Hazed (The Hardy Boys), though it appears that the consensus is that hazing is the primary topic of "hazed", and so the term should redirect there. Cúchullain t/c 16:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply



– Propose and support 1st move, which should be non-controversial, clearly no notable absolute majority subject, but neutral on the 2nd move : should Hazed (disambiguation) be moved over Hazed? Because hazed with no caps would more naturally redirect to hazing. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose both per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TWODABS. We have two topics on WP called "Hazed" - the current article and a graphic novel. This can be handled by hatnotes. Dohn joe (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support 1st, oppose 2nd. The book is clearly not the primary topic for "hazed" -- the primary meaning of that term is clearly hazing. So the dab page should stay where it is, and a hatnote should added to hazing: {{Redirect|Hazed}}. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:47, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support first I would have expected hazed to go to hazing than the novel. I see no reason to move the dab page though.--67.68.23.129 (talk) 05:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support 1st (as proposer), oppose 2nd, changing my neutral stance on 2nd on the basis of above. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support the first per BHG, clearly the primary topic is hazing. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support the first and the alternate redirect for the second, per BHG. I was considering to close this, but I'm curious to see what Dohn joe has to say now that there is a discussion of a third topic, causing TWODABS to no longer be relevant, and a possible more appropriate PRIMARYTOPIC has been provided. Tiggerjay (talk) 09:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.