Talk:Haider (film)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2014

{{INRConvert|892.1|m} 192.249.3.200 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 23:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2014

the amount of the box office collection is wrong the movie's life time collection is around 89.2 crore including overseas collection and i think that it should be changed thank you supporting my request, i provide you the link http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/haider-total-collections-in-india-and-overseas/ Sidhantgacche (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Stickee (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Haider (film)

I agree that the film has earned lot of accolades but there is no need to create a new article for that. The listed table is enough to convey the needful details. It can be kept in collapse state. Arjann (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Not at all. It's very common to have a separate awards list, and no reason to merge them with the main article, when both articles are long enough. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Cowlibob, Birdienest81, Bollyjeff, Dr. Blofeld, Ssven2, Kailash29792 could you kindly comment on this? Thanks. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

I believe if the awards section makes the main article look too long, it can have a separate article. In this case I feel a separate article for the awards is best, and it even looks FLC worthy. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Kailash. I intend to take it to FLC next. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

It does look FLC worthy. Do let me know when you have nominated it Krimuk90. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Ssven. Will do. :) --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I agree. Go ahead. Take it to GA level or whatever. But remember one thing, when it comes to Haider (film) article I'll forever be the major contributor to it because I have given my heart and soul to expand it the way it was just before this edit. Entire thing. Yes. Entire. I mean it, I swear. Read its page statistics or my edit statistics. I know it and Allah knows it. I feel ashamed to say all this in such a way but the circumstances created force me to write this here to tell you and the users involved here. Arjann (talk) 06:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Good for you. Also, read WP: OWN. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

It's fine to have a separate page for the awards.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@Krimuk90: It is you who shows ownership with articles not me. You should read WP:OWN everyday, three times a day just like breakfast, lunch and dinner. I don't give you and your owned articles a fuck. Not me, several users have had bad experience with you. This proves what you are and what you put up. I hope you have utterly bitter experiences in future here. I'm waiting when this will happen. Discouraging hardworking users is your memorandum. God will show you. He is watching everything and he knows what to do. Arjann (talk) 07:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Maybe Allah will take the form of a car and kill me when I'm crossing the road. LOL! I'll ask why Allah why, and he'll say, because you kept a separate awards list for Haider.--Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

On the contrary Arjann, myself, SchroCat and many of the other featured article producers here consider Krimuk to be one of the best editors of Indian topics and producers of lists. And a thoroughly decent chap too. And quite the opposite from what you said Arjann, Krimuk praises decent editors here and more than encourages them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Blof for the kind words. :) It's crazy how personal some editors get over such minor issues. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Arjann, please remain civil in your dealings with others. Your approach to this conversation sounds warning bells of ownership to me, and it would be best if you could try and act in a more collegiate manner. - SchroCat (talk) 07:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Krimuk90:: I agree a separate article listing the film's awards is more appropriate in this case because both the film's main article and accolade list are too long to be in this same page. Great job, but be careful with your comments.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

• @Arjann:: I agree with SchroCat that you should respond in a academic and professional manner. I understand that we all are passionate about improving articles we like, but there is no room for trash talk (see WP:NPA).

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Birdie. :) I didn't attack him in any way but I was quite amused by the "God will show you. He is watching everything and he knows what to do" comment. So unnecessary, don't you think? --Krimuk|90 (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Haider's Oedipus Complex

Theoretically Oedipus Complex is an unconscious event according to Freud. But here in this article at one point it claims to be a conscious event also , "As per the story of Hamlet, an Oedipus complex exists that draws Hamlet (played by Shahid Kapoor) towards his mother Gertrude (played by Tabu) that could have been interpreted both at a physical and psychological level"

Are you saying Oedipus Complex as explained by Freud is a conscious event or is that Oedipus Complex in Hamlet is a conscious event that can be interpreted in Physical level? Thanks Amit Mmramit (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)