Talk:Hafizullah Shabaz Khail

disputed picture

Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{npov}} tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 15:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

explanation...

The image that i have removed from the article violates the basic rules of Wikipedia. It is the own work of a Wikipedia editor who took a primary source combined it with other sources and then interpreted them. This is a violation of WP:OR. The fact that these are mostly primary sources has also further problems as it does not comply with the policies of BLP's of living people. So i see this topic as taken to the talk page and the image should not be re-included until consensus has been reached. IQinn (talk) 10:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Is this the edit you are speaking about above? If so your edit summary says: "remove image because of BLP issue - please discuss on the talk page"

If this image lapses from WP:OR it should be a trivial matter for you to explain how it lapses from WP:OR. Please offer a response that recognizes you userstand WP:OI.

If this image lapses from WP:BLP it should be a trivial matter for you to explain how it lapses from WP:BLP.

Let me preclude one of your routine response to questions I have about your edits to material I originally contributed. Among your routine responses is to avoid any meaningful attempt to address the content issues, and instead to accuse me of violating the WP:ownership.

Every wikipedia contributor has an obligation to do their best to try to answer civil and specific questions other contributors have about their contributions -- or alternately own up and acknowledge that other contributors made good points. It doesn't matter whether that contribution is newly contributed material, or a modification or excision of previously contributed material.

Any good faith contributor is welcome to pose good faith questions to other contributors, and, I believe, it does not matter whether their question is about another contributors new contributions; or about that other contributors modification or excision of material originally contributed by yet other contributors; or about modifications or excisions of material that they themselves originally contributed. I dispute that civil, meaningful, policy-based questions I pose to you, about edits to material I originally contributed should be dismissed as a violation of WP:Ownership. Geo Swan (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Proper use of the {{Cleanup-rewrite}} tag

• A {{Cleanup-rewrite}} tag was added to this article almost a year ago, by a contributor who has, so far, made no effort to explain what triggered their concern. None of us are mind-readers. When contributors add tags like this, indicating they have a concern, but fail to explain their concern it leaves the reas of guessing at their concern. We will ahve no idea if their concern has been addressed by changes we have made. We will have no idea if they would think the tag can be removed.

The tag does imply that the tag placer will have explained themselves on the talk page.

I will wait a reasonable period of time. If no meaningful, substantive, policy-based explanation is offered I will feel free to remove the tag. Geo Swan (talk) 02:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

File:ISN 1001.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:ISN 1001.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hafizullah Shabaz Khail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220004442/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/09-F-0031_doc1.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/09-F-0031_doc1.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR_Annual_Report_2008.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iqkvuVHP9_liWGnQ9Is4HY9_yeHAD966T6K08

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)