Talk:HMS Swiftsure (1903)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rcbutcher in topic 7.5 guns re-used on land?
Good articleHMS Swiftsure (1903) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHMS Swiftsure (1903) is part of the Swiftsure class battleship series, a good topic. It is also part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
August 23, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Welcome to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) Talk Page edit

Apologies to Johann Wolfgang and others for requisitioning their contributions. John Moore 309 00:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

HMS Swiftsure (1870): Help needed! edit

Are there any experts on early British ironclads who could create some text the HMS Swiftsure (1870) article? John Moore 309 00:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

7.5 guns re-used on land? edit

 

Any comments on this photo, and its description at Commons? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I originally identified this through discussion with others on the 1914-1918 WWI forum : http://1914-1918.invisionzone.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=96947&st=0&p=908234&hl=+7.5%20+inch%20+gun%20+swiftsure&fromsearch=1&#entry908234 . Reasons : the tractor and special trailer were used by Reginald Bacon to transport heavy coastal guns in France & Belgium; the possibilities for the gun based on what Bacon had are 12, 9.2 or 7.5 inch, and it appears closer to 7.5 than 9 inch and only requires a single tractor to tow it; 7.5 inch would make it one of Swiftsure's guns. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
I was thinking more of its suitability for an addition to the article. There's a lot of interesting history to the re-use of naval guns around the Great War (the monitors, even the Boer War guns). There could be a section added to this for what happened to them afterwards (did they have a significant combat history?), we might even get a whole article out of re-use in general. Andy Dingley (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Certainly British recycling of naval guns for land use was an important part of its strategy : as soon as the Navy said it didn't need a gun it was offered to the Army, but it's been sadly under-represented in the literature. I understand that the authoritative text on naval guns ashore in Flanders in WWI is Bacon's own book, but I don't have access to a copy. I understand that the artillery duel with large German guns along the coast was important for the Allies, to keep the northern ports open. There is a one-line entry on the topic in the page for the 7.5 inch Mk III gun, but I think access to Bacon's book is essential to upgrade the topic in Wiki articles. regards, Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 08:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply