 | HMS Pallas (1816) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 13, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Pallas (1816)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
I will review this one in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Lead
- frigate spent time blockading the Azores being making trips to India: something off here, perhaps "being" should be "before"?
- Oops, was meant to be "before making..."
Design
- cites 1 and 2 are in reverse order (if that's a thing for you). Same issue with first paragraph of design section
- Fixed
- the cite at the end of the second to last sentence of the second paragraph is redundant since it is the same as the last cite of the paragraph
- Good catch, this used to be a separate paragraph
Construction
- I see there is two different dates for the reorder, but you've gone with Winfield for the infobox? I assume there is no such inconsistency with the date of being laid down?
- I've gone with Winfield as the more modern source. The re-order is the only controversial date.
- Complimenting should be Complementing
- Changed
Service
- Looks all good to me
Other stuff
- Happy to AGF on sources given history of nominator
- Put the 1999 Gardiner ref ahead of the 2000 one
- Image tags all OK
- No dupe links
That's all I have for now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Zawed: Thanks for going through this! I've replied above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)