Talk:HMS Mashona

HMS Mashona has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 4, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Mashona article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Mashona (F59)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 22:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've assessed the article as B class, and will do a GA review. Djmaschek (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Here is the review. The article looks very good, but there are a few issues listed below. Djmaschek (talk) 02:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Introduction: "During first year..." > "During the first year..."
Infobox: It lists pennant number, but there is no source given for this in the text or infobox.
Wartime modifications: paragraph 1. "Mashona had hers fitted during her August–May 1940 refit." The range "August-May 1940" looks wrong. Do you mean August-October 1940?
Norwegian campaign: paragraph 2. Unless I missed an earlier reference, Sikh needs a hyperlink.
Subsequent operations: paragraph 3: "The ships rendezvoused later that afternoon..." Which ships? It's not clear to me whether Mashona met with Rodney, Mashona met with King George V, Rodney met with King George V, or some other combination.
- See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
  - GA class. All items fixed. Everything looks good. Djmaschek (talk) 21:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic