Talk:HMS Ajax (1912)

HMS Ajax (1912) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 30, 2017. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Ajax (1912)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 19:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Checks edit

GA Criteria
1 1.a Y 1.b Y 2 2.a Y 2.b Y 2.c Y 2.d Y 3 3.a Y 3.b Y 4 4.a Y 5 5.a Y 6 6.a Y 6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No Copyvio Y
No Dead links Y

Prose suggestions edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"King George V class was powered by two sets of Parsons direct-drive steam turbines, " perhaps "ships of the King George V class were powered by two sets of Parsons direct-drive steam turbines," or else simply the King George Vs were powered by two sets of Parsons direct-drive steam turbines.
"By April 1917, the 4-inch guns had been removed from the hull casemates as they were frequently unusable in heavy seas." Might wish to add in salutary in front of "4 inch guns".
- They weren't saluting guns.
"and was reduced to reserve" perhaps "and was put into the reserve fleet".
- "Placed in" works better, IMO.
That's all my suggestions. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
- - Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic