Talk:Gunga Jumna

Latest comment: 2 years ago by DaxServer in topic Requested move 24 March 2022

Fair use rationale for Image:Gungajamuna.jpg

edit
 

Image:Gungajamuna.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gunga Jumna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 24 March 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure)DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Gunga JumnaGanga Jamna – "Ganga Jamna" is the more accurate transliteration of the title. "Gunga Jumna" is not an accurate transliteration. There doesn't appear to be an official English title, so it's best to go with an accurate transliteration of the original title. Maestro2016 (talk) 06:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Strong Oppose The official transliteration of the title is "Gunga Jumna" and it was just a Google search away, @Maestro2016 seems to have not checked properly. IMDB is also located at Gunga Jumna for same reasons. Both are acceptable transliterations, and we should use the official one, i.e. Gunga Jumna as the article title. Maestro, please withdraw your proposal. Venkat TL (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose "Jumna" has been the time-honored spelling of the river in English, (see for example, File:GangesCanal2.jpg. More importantly, it is also the pronunciation of the river's name in the vernaculars (cousins of Hindi) spoken in the Ganges plain. Well, I meant to say "It was," until the frenetic nationalists, or should I say Hindi-belt Sanskrit-fantasists, changed it to Yamuna, which on account of Sanskrit being a finished (polished) language, no child can pronounce. (Similar to Hindu nationalist "Jai Shri Ram," which also no child can pronounce (in contrast to the old vernacular Jai Siya Ram). That's ends my Yumuna-rant. As for the spelling "Jamna," I've maybe seen it here and there, but "Jumna" is the top echelon, the whole top. The transliteration "Jumna" with "u" is the old East India Company-era transliteration system: u as in hut; oo as in rajpoot; a as in Calcutta (both positions of a), . Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.