Good articleGun Hill Road (road) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 12, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Gun Hill Road in the Bronx was proposed to become the Gun Hill Crosstown Expressway?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kareem41.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nontrivial coverage

edit

Where are the reliable secondary sources with nontrivial coverage? The sources listed seem to be primarily maps, subway schedules, and a gazetteer of place names, rather than anything in-depth about this particular road. Which is fine for a basic level of Wikipedia coverage, I guess, but is it really enough to support a good article nomination? —David Eppstein 18:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review

edit

Nominated November 7, 2007

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  5. It is stable.
     
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

The NY-164 - City Line Expressway reference is particularly excellent to show planning which went into this road. This article meets the above criteria. SriMesh | talk 04:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gun Hill rd does not come close to being in Morris Park at any point. The beginning of the street that they reference near the Hutchinson Parkway exit is over near Home Depot, that is not even close to being Morris Park. Cant say I know exactly what that neighborhood is called but it is, without any doubt, not Morris Park. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnatch (talkcontribs) 13:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 March 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Gun Hill Road (road). Definite consensus to move, but I can see the argument suggested by AjaxSmack, that the other titles (particularly the Subway stations) could be classed as "Bronx" as well, so going with their suggestion of "road". Note: move of the dab page will require admin assistance, which I will request after sorting the incoming links. (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply



Gun Hill RoadGun Hill Road (Bronx) – The road is not the primary topic and should be turned into a disambiguation page. The film has 4393 views in the last 90 days compared with only 2424 for the road. Inwind (talk) 09:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 10 April 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. A good case has been made that "Gun Hill Road (Bronx)" is unfortunately ambiguous. No prejudice against a new RM if an alternative to the slightly awkward "(road)" can be found. Jenks24 (talk) 17:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply



Gun Hill Road (road)Gun Hill Road (Bronx) – Compared to Gun Hill Road (IRT White Plains Road Line) and Gun Hill Road (IRT Dyre Avenue Line), this has more page views, so it is the relative primary topic, so I propose that the article be moved to the title it had before its 2013 renaming. epicgenius, presented by reddit.com/r/funny (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

No one who isn't intimately familiar with Wikipedia titling jargon would search for any title with a parentheses. They're just there to distinguish on topic from others of the same name, so they should fully distinguish the article. I'd be OK with (Bronx), but (road) is certainly more precise.--Cúchullain t/c 19:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment — I was surprised to discover that the non-disambiguated version Gun Hill Road was never used for the article about the road. Have we ever considered moving the road article to the undisambiguated title? The road seems to be the primary topic, and both Subway stations and the film derive their names from the road.  V 12:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
    @Viridiscalculus: actually the article was at the plain title Gun Hill Road until a week ago. See the move request further up on this page. That had unanimous support from four contributors to move to a no primary topic scenario. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – there is no consensus on whether WP:PDAB is valid. Best to keep the status quo. The current title is more accurate. SSTflyer 12:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This was somehow missed in GA Sweeps

edit

@Epicgenius: This article is nowhere close to being a GA, despite being listed. Do you think that this article should be reassessed? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kew Gardens 613, I agree. This and East 233rd Street (Bronx) might need reassessment, since the history sections of both articles lack a lot of information. Currently, these articles are structured similarly to good articles about rural roads, but the difference is that rural roads do not have a lot of history and are relatively straightforward, unlike these two pages. epicgenius (talk) 13:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply