Talk:Gregório de Matos
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Gregório de Mattos → Gregório de Matos – His correct name is "Matos", not "Mattos", which is an archaic form no longer used. See his article in Portuguese or Google books entires[1]. Thank you, Lecen (talk) 04:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment are there any English language books involving this person? And how did he himself spell it? -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 02:23, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Here it is: [2] This is actually not a controversual move. It's just that he's name is spelled in archaic Portuguese, which is no longer in use. --Lecen (talk) 05:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Seems about even with [3] ... so English language usage is split -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 06:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Here it is: [2] This is actually not a controversual move. It's just that he's name is spelled in archaic Portuguese, which is no longer in use. --Lecen (talk) 05:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support even though I am not a fan of these changes in the Portuguese language, it is what it is. Modern sources use Gregório de Matos and not Mattos. Paulista01 (talk) 21:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gregório de Matos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628090200/http://www.revista.agulha.nom.br/grego.html to http://www.revista.agulha.nom.br/grego.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617081418/http://www.ufba.br/~gmg/english/en-welcome.html to http://www.ufba.br/~gmg/english/en-welcome.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828085049/http://www.cultura.salvador.ba.gov.br/index2.php to http://www.cultura.salvador.ba.gov.br/index2.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)