Talk:Greater Metropolitan Area (Costa Rica)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

These sentences:

Also, this metro area is more compatible with the urban area concept, because a proper metropolitan area definition applied in this case should include some cities englobed in the conurbation of San Jose nowadays should include the cities of Alajuela, Heredia and Cartago, but this is not currently accepted by the authorities, given the status of this cities as provincial capitals too.

Simply aren't true - at least not in full - because the GAM population measurement does, indeed, include that of Alajuela from everything I've found. This probably needs to be deleted or corrected if it doesn't include the cantons in the other areas. --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The whole article is a mess, starting with its name, because the "San José metropolitan area" is not a specifically defined area. Furthermore, as the article does correctly state, the Gran Área Metropolitana spans 4 provinces, not just San José, and certainly not just the city or canton of San José Apolo2400 (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 May 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Arguments in support are far more compelling and those opposing. Jenks24 (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply



San José metropolitan areaGreater Metropolitan Area (Costa Rica) – The article refers to the area known within Costa Rica as "la Gran Área Metropolitana" or "GAM". This area is never referred to locally in Spanish as the "San José metropolitan area", nor is this an accepted term for any other (specifically defined) area in Costa Rica. I would also suggest that "Greater Metropolitan Area" is a more contextually accurate translation of the Spanish term "Gran Área Metropolitana" than "Great Metropolitan Area". The article will need to be edited to reflect the agreed-upon term following any eventual move. Relisted Calidum Talk To Me 03:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC) --Relisted. walk victor falk talk 00:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC) Apolo2400 (talk) 21:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support as per WP:PRECISE (current title isn't really precise enough), which overrides WP:CONCISE here. Also, you have correctly deduced that "Greater" works better here. I am open to other suggested titles. Red Slash 02:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Move to Greater San José Metropolitan Area per WP:NATURALDIS, and more precise than a vague and cumbersome parenthetical disambiguator. walk victor falk talk 00:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Move to Greater San José Metropolitan Area per victor falk. Local usage is obviously informative regarding COMMONNAME, but it is not the sole factor in article titling. Article titles must be sufficiently precise to convey meaning to a cosmopolitan audience. "La Gran Área Metropolitana" is comprehensible only in its local context. While the article text should reflect the fact that this is the name used locally, the article title should serve the broadest possible community of readers. Xoloz (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • victor falk, Xoloz, I don't think either of those titles is precise enough. San Jose, California often (not always) spells its name with an accented é, and it also has a metropolitan area. Red Slash 16:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater Metropolitan Area (Costa Rica). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply