Talk:Godhra train burning
Latest comment: 20 days ago by Rich Farmbrough in topic This is a biased article that contradicts the court judgement
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Godhra train burning article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | A news item involving Godhra train burning was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 February 2011. |  |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 27, 2012, February 27, 2015, February 27, 2017, February 27, 2020, February 27, 2022, and February 27, 2023. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a biased article that contradicts the court judgement edit
The courts have ruled with smple evidence that this was an act of arson. The article is lying and biased about it and cannot be trusted. 2409:40C4:2A:24D7:18BB:F637:408D:CFBD (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Our policies on maintaining a Neutral point of view require us to summarize what reliable sources say, not what the courts say. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at some of the sources there do seem to be confessions that explain how access could have been gained to the rear coach. I think the OP, while perhaps not expressing it in a suitable way, has a point. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
- Looking at some of the sources there do seem to be confessions that explain how access could have been gained to the rear coach. I think the OP, while perhaps not expressing it in a suitable way, has a point. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC).