Talk:God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You II

Notability

This article needs to assert it's notability through reliable third-party sources. It may be able to meet tests for notability once properly sourced, but without an assertion supported by reliable sources, as it stands the article is not notable. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 10:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The song made the top 10 in the UK - in what way is this not notable? At least any more or less than most songs on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.215.213 (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, as well as being included on the 'Revenge' album, which peaked at No. 6 on Billboard's Top 200. Deuce1231 (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Reworking?

I've just heard Argent's version for the first time.

What rework? 91.85.195.249 (talk) 12:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it's just a bad cover. Petra's version is a lot stronger, despite being the same song. Ventifax (talk) 05:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

It is the exact same song. It should be combined.--184.13.161.240 (talk) 23:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose that God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You II be merged into God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You. I think that the content in the Foo article can easily be explained in the context of God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You, and the God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You article is of a reasonable size that the merging of God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You II will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. In the past covers of a song have always been merged.184.13.141.64 (talk) --184.13.141.64 (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely. 100% Merge. It's ridiculous not to. They are the same song, godammit! Merge! reinthal (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)