This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York Giants, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Football League/New York Giants subprojectWikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/New York Giants subprojectTemplate:WikiProject New York GiantsNational Football League/New York Giants subproject articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
I reverted to Draft as the rivalry topic currently, clearly fails WP:SIGCOV. There is a lone and great NYT citation. There are also two Bleacher Report and SBNation citations. Both are considered less than ideal sources, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League. Draftify allows for improvements to be made to demonstrate notability. UW Dawgs (talk) 04:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
UW Dawgs, I reverted this change, as this article is pretty flushed out and fits within a general topic that appears to be notable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowboys–Packers rivalry. No doubt that the article could be improved, which I will work on in the coming days, but at this point, the article is sufficient for the mainspace. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 15:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Gonzo fan2007 and BeanieFan11: Ideally, BeanieFan11 would have incorporated some of the RS citations located in the prior AfD which directly address the rivalry topic's clear and ongoing WP:SIGCOV deficiency, such as those GNG-sufficient found by Ejgreen77[1] before moving this into main space. That said, Ejgreen77 did a stellar job with those citations in the AfD and I no longer contest yesterday's move from Draft. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
I am not quite sure I follow what you are trying to say, but my perspective is that this general topic (i.e. rivalries that are outside of divisions) can meet WP:GNG if there have been a significant number of games played, incuding notable games/events or the teams have played each other for a long time, etc. So although the article wasn't perfect from a sourcing perspective, I thought it easily justifiable that the article covered a notable topic, and was in a good enough condition to warrant mainspace. Articles in the mainspace are more likely to generate interest from other editors and incentivize collaboration and article improvement. This is the case here, as I usually am hesitant to edit a draft article into it goes to the mainspace. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 17:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, football fans! I saw that a paragraph about a recent game that was reverted a few months ago and I’d like to see if there is a consensus to add it back. (In accordance to Wikipedia protocol, if there are no responses in a week, I will automatically add it back.) My reasoning for this is that the game was the first time the Giants had won on MNF in over 7 years and greatly established the legacy of Tommy DeVito, who turned into a folk hero for the Giants this past season. If there is a consensus to re-add it, the page would look like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giants–Packers_rivalry&direction=prev&oldid=1194420905
The paragraph is supported by a laughably large amount of sources, so it seems that only notability is in question here. Thanks! Wranlo (talk) 22:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
