Talk:Gianpiero Fiorani
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page was proposed for deletion by gadfium (talk · contribs) on 28 July 2022 with the comment: The subject was acquitted of criminal charges and does not appear to have any notability beyond this event. The event is more appropriately covered at Bancopoli |
Dear Wikipedia Team,
I request the removal of this Wikipedia page, since point 1 speaks of a negative episode that Mr. Fiorani experienced more than 17 years ago, an episode that has now been overcome, in which he was able to prove his innocence by being acquitted by the Italian justice system. I add 2 links where you can check what I say:
https://www.primopianomolise.it/cronaca/giudiziaria/6309/usura-bancaria-assolto-fiorani/
Taking into account technological progress and respect for the constitutional rights of citizens, this request is made by appealing to the Right to be Forgotten (article 17 of the RGPD), which has long been recognized by European and Italian jurisprudence as “The right not to be exposed indefinitely to the subsequent damages that the repeated publication of a news item may cause to honor and reputation, unless, due to events that have occurred, the previous event becomes current and revives a new public interest in information.” In the case of Mr. Fiorani, what happened more than 17 years ago has not generated public interest again.
Furthermore, Mr. Fiorani has proven his innocence in the Italian courts, for this reason, this request is also based on the Cartabia reform. The new Cartabia Reform (law 134/2021), approved on June 17, 2022, must be taken into consideration. Which has definitively provided for in article 1, paragraph 25 the right to de-index to citizens who have undergone a judicial proceeding and have obtained acquittal or to suspects who have obtained a decree of dismissal, a sentence of no place to proceed or of acquittal .
Mr. Fiorani is not a public figure, it is disproportionate to create an entire Wikipedia page with only negative information. In addition, the two references that are named in the article are already deindexed by the original source, accepting our request for the Right to be Forgotten. It is an obsolete topic, due to the amount of time that has elapsed (more than 17 years) since the news emerged.
It is important to remember that the presence of judicial news or this type of information on the Internet can represent an obstacle to the social reintegration of a person, and that the right to be forgotten should also be recognized for those who have been rehabilitated after a sentence, all the more so for a person who has proven his innocence.
To finish, I would like to emphasize that, according to the Wikipedia classification, this page has low importance in the Financial Crime ranking.
I remain at your disposal for any additional information and/or integration that you consider necessary for the acceptance of this request.
Waiting for your response. Best regards, Nathalia Nathalia Rodríguez R (talk) 17:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Cancellation of the page due to inaccurate information
editDear Wikipedia Team, I request the removal of this Wikipedia page, since point 1 speaks of a negative episode that Mr. Fiorani experienced more than 17 years ago, an episode that has now been overcome, in which he was able to prove his innocence by being acquitted by the Italian justice system. I add 2 links where you can check what I say: https://www.blitzquotidiano.it/cronaca-italia/molise-usura-bancaria-gianpiero-fiorani-assolto-1234056/ https://www.primopianomolise.it/cronaca/giudiziaria/6309/usura-bancaria-assolto-fiorani/ Taking into account technological progress and respect for the constitutional rights of citizens, this request is made by appealing to the Right to be Forgotten (article 17 of the RGPD), which has long been recognized by European and Italian jurisprudence as “The right not to be exposed indefinitely to the subsequent damages that the repeated publication of a news item may cause to honor and reputation, unless, due to events that have occurred, the previous event becomes current and revives a new public interest in information.” In the case of Mr. Fiorani, what happened more than 17 years ago has not generated public interest again. Furthermore, Mr. Fiorani has proven his innocence in the Italian courts, for this reason, this request is also based on the Cartabia reform. The new Cartabia Reform (law 134/2021), approved on June 17, 2022, must be taken into consideration. Which has definitively provided for in article 1, paragraph 25 the right to de-index to citizens who have undergone a judicial proceeding and have obtained acquittal or to suspects who have obtained a decree of dismissal, a sentence of no place to proceed or of acquittal . Mr. Fiorani is not a public figure, it is disproportionate to create an entire Wikipedia page with only negative information. In addition, the two references that are named in the article are already deindexed by the original source, accepting our request for the Right to be Forgotten. It is an obsolete topic, due to the amount of time that has elapsed (more than 17 years) since the news emerged. It is important to remember that the presence of judicial news or this type of information on the Internet can represent an obstacle to the social reintegration of a person, and that the right to be forgotten should also be recognized for those who have been rehabilitated after a sentence, all the more so for a person who has proven his innocence. To finish, I would like to emphasize that, according to the Wikipedia classification, this page has low importance in the Financial Crime ranking. I remain at your disposal for any additional information and/or integration that you consider necessary for the acceptance of this request. Waiting for your response. Best regards, Nathalia Nathalia Rodríguez R (talk) 13:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Nathalia Rodríguez R: You may wish to start a deletion discussion, rather than wait for one of the volunteers to respond on this Talk page. Since the article was proposed for deletion (see the note at the top of this Talk page) and the proposal was removed, you'll need to nominate for deletion through a deletion discussion. For how to do that, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_nominate_a_single_page_for_deletion. The deletion policy and process is explained here: Wikipedia:Introduction_to_deletion_process. Geoff | Who, me? 17:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Gianpiero Fiorani is referenced numerous times at Bancopoli and deleting or redirecting this article would not address that. In contrast to the Right to be Forgotten, Wikipedia has WP:NOTTEMPORARY. We also have WP:BLP which may be applicable here. ~Kvng (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)