Talk:Gerard Adams

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Molochmeditates in topic BLP is seriously lacking in Reliable Sources

Untitled edit

Start of page.2601:C1:0:CD00:0:0:0:CD03 (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerard Adams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerard Adams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Redirect to Gerry Adams edit

Non-notable entrepreneur; affiliated with one notable company, but that's insufficient for notability. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or self-promotion. Not notable as a media contributor either. I restored the redirect to Gerry Adams. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Interesting. Elite Daily is notable, but so is FOWNDERS. F just doesn't have a wikipedia page. Subject also appears notable as an influencer and media, which, by nature, are self promo. Most of the sources are tier 1. I even see NYT in the mix, and a lot of name in title works on both coasts... I think there is lower hanging fruit in the space if we're going on an axing spree.172.58.175.61 (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Added sources, per tag edit

I added two sources that were dedicated to Adams, per cleanup tag.

There are several more sources available and I plan to expand this page in the future.

VentureKit (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

BLP is seriously lacking in Reliable Sources edit

There are some reliable sources for the lede, but most of the career section and rest of the article seems to based on self-proclaimed statements made in non reliable first-party sources instead of reliable third-party sources. As such, these sources seem inadequate for a BLP. If anyone has better sources, I'd be interested to source them in an effort to clean up the article. --Molochmeditates (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply