Talk:Georgia Frontiere

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Kdammers in topic vote

Feminist Whining edit

In my opinion there is far too much feminist whining in this article. The fact that league staff was and is mainly male is due to the fact that from the beginning football was played by males, and wealthy males supported the establishment of the NFL, etc. There is no evidence of "domination" by males. Georgia Frontiere was in a position to be influential in the NFL not because of her own success in the marketplace, but because she happened to marry multiple times and outlived a very wealthy husband. I think a more balanced article would not whine so much about the demographics of the league, and focus on what contributions Ms. Frontiere made as an owner. Kerry (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any evidence of feminism, let alone whining. The article clearly establishes that a female owner in the NFL was indeed a very unique reality considering that even today there are no majority owners in the NFL (let alone any other major American sport) that are female. The criticism she received from the media because of her gender was real and significant part of her NFL career. --108.0.215.194 (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

NPOV Issues edit

Speculation and insinuation about her husbands death don't belong here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.0.39.129 (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ummm... there are some major NPOV and lack of source citation here. For one thing, the article alleges that she orchestrated the murder of her husband, which obviously hasn't been proven in a court of law, or she'd be in prison right now. Someone who knows about Ms. Frontiere's circumstances desperately needs to clean up this article. 150.243.123.44 03:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC) (TysK, I'm not signed in)Reply

Agreed - I have tagged this article. If someone familiar with the subject can clean it up an substantiate the claims, please do so. If not, I'll remove the unsourced material, but that will leave a very slender article. Also, I'm removing the reference to her spouse, as she has none (former husbands should be addressed in the article, though). --Chancemichaels 15:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)ChancemichaelsReply

the ending paragraph is opinion of someone in favor of the team going back to L.A. . I don't think it should be there. It's a factual account of this woman's life and is out of place here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.156.242 (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Only Female Owner? edit

What about Virginia McCaskey, who owns the Bears?The Invisible Man (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia Frontiere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

vote edit

"Frontiere casting the deciding vote in a 23-6 decision"- Normally, unless otherwise indicated, we expect a yes/no vote to be decided by a simple majority. So, how does one person cast the deciding vote in such a lopsided vote? Was there a roll call, and when GF voted, the count passed fifty percent? Or is there some other explanation of there being "a" deciding vote in a 23-6 decision? Kdammers (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply