Talk:Geoffrey Robinson (politician)

Untitled

someone removed the cocaine stuff: Robinson in the clear on cocaine claims Its here if someone wants to add it. Chendy (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Cocaine Allegations ??

Should be a link included (yours is out of date). Article now at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-152209/Powder-police-van-says-Robinson.html and another at http://www.epolitix.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/robinson-in-the-clear-on-cocaine-claims/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.218.200 (talk) 20:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Date of leaving Blair government

The main part of the article says December 1998, but for some unknown reason the lede says January 1999. Whilst it is true that Dawn Primarolo succeeded GR as Paymaster General on 4 January, it doesn't follow that GR was in office until 3 January. Many sources, including politics.co.uk and [[1]] say he left office in December along with Peter Mandelson. Unless anyone can point out what I am missing, I will standardize the accounts given in the article in the New Year. Harfarhs (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Done Harfarhs (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Geoffrey Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929070721/http://www.labourincoventry.org.uk/northwest/ to http://www.labourincoventry.org.uk/northwest/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

More detail required on the amount and source of wealth

Currently the article just says its due to previously having been a businessman - vague. My local grocery shop proprietor is a businessman, but not wealthy. 92.24.183.171 (talk) 10:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

As long as you can provide plausible sources you are very welcome to tell us what you think you know. Your sources do not need to be online, though if the matter will become contentious, it is helpful if they are. Your sources should in any case be publicly accessible - books or respectable journals that can be consulted in a university (or other) library. And you should make it clear that you are reporting the opinion(s) and research(es) of others. "According to .... writing in the Daily Mail on [date] ..." Except that for some reason wikipedia does not seem to regard the Daily Mail as a reliable source. Maybe you should stick with the Financial Times or Who's Who. (Sadly, the sources of wealth for your local grocery shop proprietor are unlikely to be of sufficient interest to merit a wikipedia article. But Geoffrey Robinson has evidently achieved .... stuff. And when he turns up on Radio 4 he generally makes a certain amount of sense IM(H)O.) Success Charles01 (talk) 11:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)