Talk:General Lew Wallace Study

The Popeil Fisherman

Wallace invented the Popeil Fisherman?

"And if you call within the next 10 minutes we'll also include... "

Jhendin (talk) 08:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Kangaroo court?

"presiding over the kangaroo court that resulted in the execution of Henry Wirz for the Union deaths at Andersonville prison" Having looked at the Wiki article on the Wirz trial to refresh my memory, it was controversial, but I do not think a consensus of opinion exists to justify labeling it, without qualification, a "kangaroo court." It was a court-martial; it was a war-crimes trial; it was just a "trial." It seems like the pro-Confederate editorializing inherent in the phrase "kangaroo court" is both questionable, and out of place in an article about a building. 71.86.117.123 (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Importance Rating

I don't understand why this is article is rated of 'High Importance' in the National Register of Historic Places? The location is the study of a minor general in the U.S. Army. He has some literary note and had some minor roles in the national government, i.e., foreign affairs. All of his activities had insignificant impact on national policy, development or society. I'd assume 'mid-importance' just on the number of areas he was involved in. I'd recommend are review and change in the importance rating.Chris Light (talk) 00:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

It's a National Historic Landmark. While I agree with your underlying assertion, assessments aren't subjective and our opinions don't matter much here. The WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places has an assessment guidance page for helping editors to make such determinations. The page history here shows an edit on 15 January 2011 by User:Dudemanfellabra, a member and frequent contributor to the WikiProject NRHP (and not a frequent contributor to the page). This editor left an edit summary as "high importance nrhp; site is an NHL". In this assertion, Dudemanfellabra is exactly correct. As the "importance scale" on the assessment guidance page shows of the roughly 85,000 NRHPs, only about 2500 are designated by the US Department of the Interior as National Historic Landmarks, and that all such designated places are to be rated as "high" importance. If you wish to dispute the assessment you should take your discussion to the project's talk page. For my part, I agree with the assessment. BusterD (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Lew Wallace Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605231501/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1590&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1590&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)