External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gaviiformes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420070851/http://www.pca.state.mn.us/oea/reduce/sinkers.cfm to http://www.pca.state.mn.us/oea/reduce/sinkers.cfm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206134020/http://fwp.mt.gov/fieldguide/detail_ABNBA01030.aspx to http://fwp.mt.gov/fieldguide/detail_ABNBA01030.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307225733/http://www.app.pan.pl/acta52/app52-001.pdf to http://www.app.pan.pl/acta52/app52-001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Puzzling sentence
editCould someone please explain this: "More recently, it has become clear that the Anseriformes (waterfowl) and the Galliformes are the most ancient groups of modern birds, and these being distinct by the end of the Albian 100 million years ago (Ma), while just possible, is not at all well-supported." Huh? Kostaki mou (talk) 23:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Ditto! About to ask the same.
- which bit is not well supported?
- were they distinct a 100 million years ago?
- MBG02 (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)