Talk:Frederick de la Roche

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 2001:41D0:FE75:FB00:290:F5FF:FE8B:4EBF in topic Frederick wasn't chancellor of the kingdom of 1150

Frederick wasn't chancellor of the kingdom of 1150

edit

As I have explained in this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Officers_of_the_Kingdom_of_Jerusalem#Possible_errors_in_chancellors there was probably no chancellor at this moment, and even there would be one, Frederick would not have forgotten to include his title as bishop of Acre net to his title as chancellor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:41D0:FE75:FB00:290:F5FF:FE8B:4EBF (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply