Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Francis Owen (philologist)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Lede

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• Yes, concise

Early Life and Education

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• Good, well narrated.
• Neat, well scribed. Would that it were that the Commonwealth (and Winston) were appraised of his views.

Career

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• 'tis a pity all these references to Edmonton Journal require registration to read

Later Life

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• Welcommen in Deutschland.
• Well scribed, well referenced.

Selected Works

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• A link to the University of Chicago Wikipedia page is not a good reference. It seems the best reference might be to Alliterative_verse

See Also

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• Examined.

References

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• All examined

Further Reading

1. Is it reasonably well written?

• The University of Alberta is Down For Maintenance !

 

---

End Matter

1. Is it is Broad in its coverage?

• Yes

1. Is it Verifiable with no original research?

• Yes, all information is suitably referenced

1. Does the article meet notability guidelines?

• Yes.

1. Does it follow WP:NPOV Neutral Point of View?

• Quite so.

1. Is it stable?

• This page started life on 31 August 2019
• Over 90 days, this page has had 190 views
• There have been six human editors (bots have been on the page)
• There have been 39 edits to the page with no evidence of edit warring.

1. Top editors are

    * Krakkos
    * Chewings72
    * John of Reading
    * Orenburg1
    * DuncanHill
    * FeanorStar7

1. It is illustrated by images ?

• The image of Dr. Francis Owen is a picture of Francis Owen printed in the Edmonton Journal
• This Canadian work is in the public domain in Canada because its copyright has expired

Overall

• Good work, good scribing.

Conclusion

 Passed       --Whiteguru (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC) @Krakkos:

Great! Krakkos (talk) 13:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)